Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of Glenoid Fossa Position in Class II Malocclusion Associated with Mandibular Retrusion and Class III Malocclusion Associated with Mandibular Protrusion.
Chandrika, P Sindhu; Alla, Ramya; Duddu, Yesuratnam; Adarsh, Kumar; Varma, Praveen K; Mandava, Prasad.
Afiliación
  • Chandrika PS; Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Government Dental College and Hospital, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh, India.
  • Alla R; Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Government Dental College and Hospital, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh, India.
  • Duddu Y; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Government Dental College and Hospital, Kadapa, Andhra Pradesh, India.
  • Adarsh K; Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Narsinhbhai Patel Dental College and Hospital, Sankalchand Patel University, Visnagar, Gujarat, India.
  • Varma PK; Department of Orthodontics, Vishnu Dental College, Vishnupur, Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India.
  • Mandava P; Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Narayana Dental College and Hospital, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh, India.
J Pharm Bioallied Sci ; 16(Suppl 1): S349-S352, 2024 Feb.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38595524
ABSTRACT

Objective:

This study examined the glenoid fossa in Class II and Class III malocclusions with mandibular retrusion and protrusion. Materials and

Methods:

A retrospective investigation examined 60 Class II and 60 Class III cephalometric radiographs. Cephalometric landmarks and glenoid fossa measurements were taken. Statistical analysis contrasted the two malocclusion groups' glenoid fossas.

Results:

Class II malocclusion had a much lower mean Sella-Nasion-Condylion (SNCd) angle (glenoid fossa sagittal position) than Class III (14.6° ± 1.9). Class II malocclusion had a lower mean Sella-Nasion-Gonion (SNGo) angle (32.5° ± 4.3) than Class III (36.2° ± 3.9). The SNCd angle and SNGo angle in both groups demonstrated a negative correlation, demonstrating a relationship between the glenoid fossa and the mandibular sagittal axis.

Conclusion:

The glenoid fossa location differs significantly between Class II malocclusion with mandibular retrusion and Class III with protrusion. Class II malocclusion has a posterior glenoid fossa, while Class III has a less posterior one. Understanding these links may help patients receive more personalized treatment.
Palabras clave
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Pharm Bioallied Sci Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: India Pais de publicación: India
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Pharm Bioallied Sci Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: India Pais de publicación: India