Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Quality assurance in surgical trials of arteriovenous grafts for haemodialysis: A systematic review, a narrative exploration and expert recommendations.
Kingsmore, David B; Edgar, Ben; Aitken, Emma; Calder, Francis; Franchin, Marco; Geddes, Colin; Inston, Nick; Jackson, Andrew; Jones, Rob G; Karydis, Nikolaos; Kasthuri, Ram; Mestres, Gaspar; Papadakis, Georgios; Sivaprakasam, Rajesh; Stephens, Mike; Stevenson, Karen; Stove, Callum; Szabo, Lazslo; Thomson, Peter C; Tozzi, Matteo; White, Richard D.
Afiliación
  • Kingsmore DB; Renal and Transplant Surgery, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
  • Edgar B; Vascular Surgery, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
  • Aitken E; School of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
  • Calder F; Renal and Transplant Surgery, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
  • Franchin M; School of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
  • Geddes C; Renal and Transplant Surgery, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
  • Inston N; School of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
  • Jackson A; Renal & Transplant Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Jones RG; Department of Vascular Surgery, University of Insubria, Varesi, Italy.
  • Karydis N; Department of Nephrology, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
  • Kasthuri R; Renal and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
  • Mestres G; Renal and Transplant Surgery, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
  • Papadakis G; Interventional Radiology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
  • Sivaprakasam R; Department of Renal and Transplant Surgery, University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
  • Stephens M; Department of Interventional Radiology, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
  • Stevenson K; Department of Vascular Surgery, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Stove C; Renal & Transplant Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Szabo L; Department of Renal and Transplant Surgery, Royal London, London, UK.
  • Thomson PC; Dialysis Access Team, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK.
  • Tozzi M; Renal and Transplant Surgery, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
  • White RD; Department of Interventional Radiology, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
J Vasc Access ; : 11297298241236521, 2024 Mar 19.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38501338
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Introducing new procedures and challenging established paradigms requires well-designed randomised controlled trials (RCT). However, RCT in surgery present unique challenges with much of treatment tailored to the individual patient circumstances, refined by experience and limited by organisational factors. There has been considerable debate over the outcomes of arteriovenous grafts (AVG) compared to AVF, but any differences may reflect differing practice and potential variability. It is essential, therefore, when considering an RCT of a novel surgical procedure or device that quality assurance (QA) is defined for both the new approach and the comparator. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the QA standards performed in RCT of AVG using a multi-national, multi-disciplinary approach and propose an approach for future RCT.

METHOD:

The methods of this have been previously registered (PROSPERO CRD420234284280) and published. In summary, a four-stage review was performed identification of RCT of AVG, initial review, multidisciplinary appraisal of QA methods and reconciliation. QA measures were sought in four areas - generic, credentialing, standardisation and monitoring, with data abstracted by a multi-national, multi-speciality review body.

RESULTS:

QA in RCT involving AVG in all four domains is highly variable, often sub-optimally described and has not improved over the past three decades. Few RCT established or defined a pre-RCT level of experience, none documented a pre-trial education programme, or had minimal standards of peri-operative management, no study had a defined pre-trial monitoring programme, and none assessed technical performance.

CONCLUSION:

QA in RCT is a relatively new area that is expanding to ensure evidence is reliable and reproducible. This review demonstrates that QA has not previously been detailed, but can be measured in surgical RCT of vascular access, and that a four-domain approach can easily be implemented into future RCT.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Vasc Access Asunto de la revista: ANGIOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Vasc Access Asunto de la revista: ANGIOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos