Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Rice straw ash and amphibian health: A deep dive into microbiota changes and potential ecological consequences.
Dong, Wen-Jing; Xu, Ming-da; Yang, Xue-Wen; Yang, Xiu-Mei; Long, Xin-Zhou; Han, Xiao-Yun; Cui, Li-Yong; Tong, Qing.
Afiliación
  • Dong WJ; School of Biology and Agriculture, Jiamusi University, Jiamusi 154007, China.
  • Xu MD; School of Biology and Agriculture, Jiamusi University, Jiamusi 154007, China.
  • Yang XW; School of Biology and Agriculture, Jiamusi University, Jiamusi 154007, China.
  • Yang XM; College of Veterinary Medicine, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China.
  • Long XZ; School of Biology and Agriculture, Jiamusi University, Jiamusi 154007, China.
  • Han XY; School of Biology and Agriculture, Jiamusi University, Jiamusi 154007, China.
  • Cui LY; School of Biology and Agriculture, Jiamusi University, Jiamusi 154007, China.
  • Tong Q; School of Biology and Agriculture, Jiamusi University, Jiamusi 154007, China; College of Veterinary Medicine, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China. Electronic address: lxixl@126.com.
Sci Total Environ ; 926: 171651, 2024 May 20.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38490417
ABSTRACT
Rice straw is burned as a result of agricultural practices and technical limitations, generating significant volumes of ash that might have environmental and ecological consequences; however, the effects on organisms have not been researched. Amphibians depend on their gut and skin microbiomes. Ash exposure may cause inflammation and changes in microbial diversity and function in frogs' skin and gut microbiota due to its chemical composition and physical presence, but the implications remain unclear. Rana dybowskii were exposed to five aqueous extracts of ashes (AEA) concentrations for 30 days to study survival, metal concentrations, and microbial diversity, analyzing the microbiota of the cutaneous and gut microbiota using Illumina sequencing. Dominant elements in ash K > Ca > Mg > Na > Al > Fe. In AEA, K > Na > Ca > Mg > As > Cu. Increased AEA concentrations significantly reduced frog survival. Skin microbiota alpha diversity varied significantly among all treatment groups, but not gut microbiota. Skin microbiota differed significantly across treatments via Bray-Curtis and weighted UniFrac; gut microbiota was only affected by Bray-Curtis. Skin microbiota varied significantly with AEA levels in Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria, and Firmicutes, while the gut microbiota's dominant phyla, Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Proteobacteria, remained consistent across all groups. Lastly, the functional prediction showed that the skin microbiota had big differences in how it worked and looked, which were linked to different health and environmental adaptation pathways. The gut microbiota, on the other hand, had smaller differences. In conclusion, AEA exposure affects R. dybowskii survival and skin microbiota diversity, indicating potential health and ecological impacts, with less effect on gut microbiota.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Oryza / Microbiota / Microbioma Gastrointestinal Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Sci Total Environ Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China Pais de publicación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Oryza / Microbiota / Microbioma Gastrointestinal Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Sci Total Environ Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China Pais de publicación: Países Bajos