Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cumulative cancer locations on prostate biopsy and active surveillance outcomes in the MRI era.
Fletcher, Sean A; Mamawala, Mufaddal M; Holler, Albert E; Bhanji, Yasin; Macura, Katarzyna J; de la Calle, Claire M; Pavlovich, Christian P.
Afiliación
  • Fletcher SA; Department of Urology, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  • Mamawala MM; Department of Urology, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  • Holler AE; Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  • Bhanji Y; Department of Urology, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  • Macura KJ; Department of Urology, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  • de la Calle CM; Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  • Pavlovich CP; Department of Urology, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Prostate ; 84(8): 723-730, 2024 Jun.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38476030
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

To validate the use of a cumulative cancer locations (CCLO) score, a measurement of tumor volume on biopsy, and to develop a novel magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-informed CCLO (mCCLO) score to predict clinical outcomes on active surveillance (AS).

METHODS:

The CCLO score is a sum of uniquely involved sextants with prostate cancer on diagnostic + confirmatory biopsy. The mCCLO score incorporates MRI findings into the CCLO score. Participants included 1284 individuals enrolled on AS between 1994 and 2022, 343 of whom underwent prostate MRI. The primary outcome was grade reclassification (GR) to grade group ≥2 disease; the secondary outcome was receipt of definitive treatment.

RESULTS:

Increasing CCLO and mCCLO risk groups were associated with higher risk of GR and undergoing definitive treatment (both p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, increasing mCCLO score was associated with higher risk of GR and receipt of definitive treatment (hazard ratios [HRs] per 1-unit increase 1.26 [95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12-1.41] and 1.21 [95% CI 1.07-1.36], respectively). The model using mCCLO score to predict GR (c-index 0.671; 95% CI 0.621-0.721) performed at least as well as models using the number of cores positive for cancer (0.664 [0.613-0.715]; p = 0.7) and the maximum percentage of cancer in a core (0.641 [0.585-0.696]; p = 0.14).

CONCLUSIONS:

The CCLO score is a valid, objective metric to predict GR and receipt of treatment in a large AS cohort. The ability of the MRI-informed mCCLO to predict GR is on par with traditional metrics of tumor volume but is more descriptive and may benefit from greater reproducibility. The mCCLO score can be implemented as a shorthand, informative tool for counseling patients about whether to remain on AS.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Próstata / Neoplasias de la Próstata / Imagen por Resonancia Magnética / Espera Vigilante Límite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Prostate Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Próstata / Neoplasias de la Próstata / Imagen por Resonancia Magnética / Espera Vigilante Límite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Prostate Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos