Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A comparison among oscillometric waveforms in healthy nonpregnant women, pregnancy and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.
Ringrose, Jennifer S; Sridar, Sangita; Araneta, Patricia; Chan, Lillian; Kassam, Jalisa; Wirzba, Mira; Greeff, Kate; Ramsay, Gillian; Sia, Winnie; Khurana, Rshmi; Bader, Erin; Padwal, Raj.
Afiliación
  • Ringrose JS; Department of Medicine, University of Alberta.
  • Sridar S; Women and Children's Health Research Institute.
  • Araneta P; Department of Medicine, University of Alberta.
  • Chan L; Department of Medicine, University of Alberta.
  • Kassam J; Department of Medicine, University of Alberta.
  • Wirzba M; Department of Medicine, University of Alberta.
  • Greeff K; Faculty of Arts.
  • Ramsay G; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  • Sia W; Department of Medicine, University of Alberta.
  • Khurana R; Department of Medicine, University of Alberta.
  • Bader E; Department of Medicine, University of Alberta.
  • Padwal R; Women and Children's Health Research Institute.
Blood Press Monit ; 29(4): 167-172, 2024 Aug 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38465772
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Understanding of how oscillometric waveforms (OMW) vary between pregnant and nonpregnant individuals remains low. An exploratory analysis was completed to assess for quantitative and qualitative changes in OMW and oscillometric envelope features in pregnancy. DESIGN AND

METHODS:

Eighteen pregnant individuals (over 20 weeks gestational age) and healthy, nonpregnant (HNP) women were recruited. Six HNP were matched to six healthy pregnant (HP) women, and six pregnant women with a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy (HDP) by age, arm circumference, and cuff size. Blood pressure measurements were completed per the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) protocol using a custom-built oscillometric device as the test device and two-observer mercury auscultation as the reference measurement. Auscultatory blood pressure and blood pressure derived from slope-based and fixed ratio algorithms were determined. OMW and envelope features were compared among groups.

RESULTS:

In HNP, HP, and HDP groups respectively mean auscultatory blood pressure (systolic mean ± SD/diastolic mean ± SD) was 103.4 ±â€…12.2/67.1 ±â€…7.9; 109.5 ±â€…3.1/58.1 ±â€…6.4; 135.6 ±â€…18.9/85.1 ±â€…14.2 mmHg. HDP had significantly higher auscultatory systolic and diastolic blood pressure than the HP group ( P  = 0.001). The pregnant groups had a lower average pulse width (mean ± SD HNP = 0.8 ±â€…0 s, HP = 0.6 ±â€…0.1 s, HDP = 0.6 ±â€…0.1 s; HP vs. HNP mean difference [adjusted P value] 0.2 [ P  = 0.004], HDP vs. HNP 0.1 [ P  = 0.018]) compared with the HNP group. The HDP group had a larger area under the OMW envelope than the HNP group (mean ± SD HNP = 22.6 ±â€…3.4; HDP = 28.5 ±â€…4.2; HDP vs. HNP mean difference [adjusted P value] 5.9 P  = 0.05).

CONCLUSION:

In this exploratory work, differences in the OMW morphology and parameters were found in pregnancy and in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy compared with healthy controls. Even small differences may have important implications in algorithm development; further work comparing OMW envelopes in pregnancy is needed to optimize the algorithms used to determine blood pressure in pregnancy.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Oscilometría / Hipertensión Inducida en el Embarazo Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: Blood Press Monit Asunto de la revista: ANGIOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Oscilometría / Hipertensión Inducida en el Embarazo Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: Blood Press Monit Asunto de la revista: ANGIOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Reino Unido