Long-Term Outcomes of Mechanical Versus Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Cureus
; 16(1): e52550, 2024 Jan.
Article
en En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-38371071
ABSTRACT
This study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of bioprosthetic (BV) versus mechanical valves (MV) on long-term outcomes in 50- to 70-year-old aortic stenosis (AS) patients. A literature search for articles published until April 2023 yielded 13 eligible studies, with 15,320 patients divided into BV (n = 7,320) and MV (n = 8,000) cohorts. The review was registered prospectively with PROSPERO (CRD42021278777). MV demonstrated a favorable hazard ratio (HR 1.12, 95% CI 1.00-1.25, I2 = 60%) and higher survival rates at 5 (OR1.13, 95% CI 1.02-1.25, I2 = 42%) and 10 years (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.05-1.23, I2 = 0%). At 15 years, stroke incidence was comparable (OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.98-1.27, I2 = 4%). BV showed lower bleeding events (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.18-2.46, I2 = 88%), but MV replacement showed lower reoperation incidence (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.18-0.42, I2 = 85%). MV appears favorable for the long-term approach in AS management compared to BV.
Texto completo:
1
Colección:
01-internacional
Base de datos:
MEDLINE
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Cureus
Año:
2024
Tipo del documento:
Article
Pais de publicación:
Estados Unidos