Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Long-term functional outcome between Yamane technique and retropupillary iris-claw technique in a large study cohort.
Guerin, Pier Luigi; Guerin, Gian Marco; Pastore, Marco Rocco; Gouigoux, Stefano; Tognetto, Daniele.
Afiliación
  • Guerin PL; From the Eye Clinic, Department of Medical, Surgical Sciences and Health, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
J Cataract Refract Surg ; 50(6): 605-610, 2024 Jun 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38350232
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To evaluate which secondary intraocular lens (IOL) implantation technique was more successful in achieving the best postoperative results and refractive outcomes between retropupillary iris-claw IOL (ICIOL) and flanged intrascleral IOL (FIIOL) fixation with the Yamane technique.

SETTING:

Eye Clinic of the University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.

DESIGN:

Retrospective observational study.

METHODS:

116 eyes of 110 patients who underwent ICIOL or FIIOL were analyzed. Patients with follow-up shorter than 6 months or with incomplete clinical data were excluded. Collected data included demographics, ocular comorbidity, indication of surgery, intraocular pressure, early (≤1 month) and late (>1 month) postoperative complications, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and manifest refraction at the last follow-up visit.

RESULTS:

50% (n = 58) of eyes underwent FIIOL and 50% (n = 58) ICIOL implantation for aphakia (n = 44, 38%) and IOL dislocation (n = 72, 62%). No statistically significant differences in demographics, comorbidity, follow-up duration, postoperative complications, and surgical indications were found. The refractive prediction error (RPE) was 0.69 ± 0.94 diopter (D) in the FIIOL group and 0.21 ± 0.75 D in the ICIOL group ( P = .03), indicating residual hyperopia after both techniques. RPE, mean absolute error, and median absolute error were higher in the FIIOL group ( P = .003). ICIOL implantation was more successful in obtaining a RPE between -0.50 D and +0.50 D (52% of ICIOL, n = 30, and 31% of FIIOL, n = 18).

CONCLUSIONS:

Both techniques were effective in increasing preoperative CDVA with no statistical difference between them. Although complication rates did not significantly differ, the FIIOL group exhibited less predictable refractive outcomes. Adjusting the dioptric power of the 3-piece IOL, as performed in ciliary sulcus implantation, to prevent myopic shift, is not recommended.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Refracción Ocular / Agudeza Visual / Iris / Implantación de Lentes Intraoculares / Lentes Intraoculares Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Cataract Refract Surg Asunto de la revista: OFTALMOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Refracción Ocular / Agudeza Visual / Iris / Implantación de Lentes Intraoculares / Lentes Intraoculares Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Cataract Refract Surg Asunto de la revista: OFTALMOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos