Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Further development of the reflective practice questionnaire.
Rogers, Shane L; Van Winkle, Lon; Michels, Nicole; Lucas, Cherie; Ziada, Hassan; Da Silva, Eduardo Jorge; Jotangia, Amit; Gabrielsson, Sebastian; Gustafsson, Silje; Priddis, Lynn.
Afiliación
  • Rogers SL; Psychology, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
  • Van Winkle L; Medical Humanities, Rocky Vista University, Denver, Colorado, United States of America.
  • Michels N; Medical Humanities, Rocky Vista University, Denver, Colorado, United States of America.
  • Lucas C; Pharmacy, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Ziada H; Dental Medicine, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Nevada, United States of America.
  • Da Silva EJ; Physical Education and Sport, University of Lusofona, Lisbon, Portugal.
  • Jotangia A; Cygnet Health Care, Stevenage, United Kingdom.
  • Gabrielsson S; Health, Education and Technology, Lulea University of Technology, Lulea, Sweden.
  • Gustafsson S; Health, Education and Technology, Lulea University of Technology, Lulea, Sweden.
  • Priddis L; Law School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
PeerJ ; 12: e16879, 2024.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38344297
ABSTRACT

Background:

This article provides an update of the Reflective Practice Questionnaire (RPQ). The original RPQ consisted of 40-items with 10-sub-scales. In this article, the RPQ is streamlined into a 10-item single reflective practice construct, and a 30-item extended version that includes additional sub-scales of confidence, uncertainty/stress, and work satisfaction.

Methods:

A total of 501 university students filled out an online questionnaire that contained the original Reflective Practice Questionnaire, and two general measures of reflection The Self-Reflection and Insight Scale, and the Rumination-Reflection Questionnaire.

Results:

Based on factor analysis, the RPQ was streamlined into a brief 10-item version, and an extended 30-item version. Small positive correlations were found between the RPQ reflective practice measure and the two measures of general reflection, providing discriminant validity evidence for the RPQ. The RPQ was found to be sensitive to differences among industries, whereas the general measures of reflection were not. Average reflective practice scores were higher for health and education industries compared to retail and food/accommodation industries.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Reflexión Cognitiva / Procesos Mentales Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: PeerJ Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Reflexión Cognitiva / Procesos Mentales Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: PeerJ Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos