Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the stressors in breast cancer scale: a translation and validation study.
Hu, Wenqi; Bao, Jiahui; Yang, Xiaolin; Ye, Mao.
Afiliación
  • Hu W; The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning, China.
  • Bao J; The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning, China.
  • Yang X; China Medical University, Liaoning, China.
  • Ye M; The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning, China. caac2008@126.com.
BMC Public Health ; 24(1): 425, 2024 Feb 09.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38336690
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To translate the Stressors in Breast Cancer Scale (SBCS) from English to Chinese and assess its psychometric properties.

METHODS:

The Brislin's translation model was applied to perform forward translation, back translation, cross-cultural adaptation, Whereas the Chinese version of the SBCS was formed by conducting pre-testing. A cohort of 878 breast cancer patients participated in this methodological study. Content validity, construct validity, convergent validity, discriminant validity, and criterion-related validity were used to establish validity. Internal consistency reliability, split-half reliability, and test-retest reliability were used to establish reliability.

RESULTS:

The final scale contained five dimensions and 24 items, including interpersonal relationship and healthcare strains, worries and concerns about the future, physical appearance and sex strains, daily difficulties and health. The average content validity index of the scale was 0.975. The goodness-of-fit index (χ2/DF = 2.416, RMSEA = 0.057, GFI = 0.896, CFI = 0.947, IFI = 0.947, and TLI = 0.939) indicated that the model was well-fitted. The composite reliability (CR) of the dimensions ranged from 0.825 to 0.934, the average variance extracted (AVE) ranged from 0.539 to 0.712, and the correlation coefficients of each dimension with the other dimensions were less than the square root of the AVE for that dimension. The Criterion-related validity was 0.511. The Cronbach's alpha was 0.938, and the dimensions ranged from 0.779 to 0.900. Split-half reliability was 0.853, with dimensions ranging from 0.761 to 0.892. Test-retest reliability was 0.855.

CONCLUSIONS:

The Chinese version of the SBCS has good reliability and validity, which can be applied to the assessment of stressors in breast cancer patients in China.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Psicometría / Neoplasias de la Mama / Pueblo Asiatico Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Female / Humans País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: BMC Public Health Asunto de la revista: SAUDE PUBLICA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China Pais de publicación: Reino Unido
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Psicometría / Neoplasias de la Mama / Pueblo Asiatico Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Female / Humans País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: BMC Public Health Asunto de la revista: SAUDE PUBLICA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China Pais de publicación: Reino Unido