Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress scoring system for predicting complications following abdominal surgery: A meta-analysis spanning 2004 to 2022.
Pang, Tian-Shu; Cao, Li-Ping.
Afiliación
  • Pang TS; Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310016, Zhejiang Province, China.
  • Cao LP; Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310016, Zhejiang Province, China. caolipingzju@zju.edu.cn.
World J Gastrointest Surg ; 16(1): 215-227, 2024 Jan 27.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38328319
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Postoperative complications remain a paramount concern for surgeons and healthcare practitioners.

AIM:

To present a comprehensive analysis of the Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress (E-PASS) scoring system's efficacy in predicting postoperative complications following abdominal surgery.

METHODS:

A systematic search of published studies was conducted, yielding 17 studies with pertinent data. Parameters such as preoperative risk score (PRS), surgical stress score (SSS), comprehensive risk score (CRS), postoperative complications, postoperative mortality, and other clinical data were collected for meta-analysis. Forest plots were employed for continuous and binary variables, with χ2 tests assessing heterogeneity (P value).

RESULTS:

Patients experiencing complications after abdominal surgery exhibited significantly higher E-PASS scores compared to those without complications [mean difference and 95% confidence interval (CI) of PRS 0.10 (0.05-0.15); SSS 0.04 (0.001-0.08); CRS 0.19 (0.07-0.31)]. Following the exclusion of low-quality studies, results remained valid with no discernible heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis indicated that variations in sample size and age may contribute to heterogeneity in CRS analysis. Binary variable meta-analysis demonstrated a correlation between high CRS and increased postoperative complication rates [odds ratio (OR) (95%CI) 3.01 (1.83-4.95)], with a significant association observed between high CRS and postoperative mortality [OR (95%CI) 15.49 (3.75-64.01)].

CONCLUSION:

In summary, postoperative complications in abdominal surgery, as assessed by the E-PASS scoring system, are consistently linked to elevated PRS, SSS, and CRS scores. High CRS scores emerge as risk factors for heightened morbidity and mortality. This study establishes the accuracy of the E-PASS scoring system in predicting postoperative morbidity and mortality in abdominal surgery, underscoring its potential for widespread adoption in effective risk assessment.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: World J Gastrointest Surg Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: World J Gastrointest Surg Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos