Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Relationship between soft tissue dimensions and tomographic radial root position classification system for immediate implant installation.
Rodrigues, Diogo Moreira; Gluckman, Howard; Pontes, Carla Cruvinel; Januário, Alessandro Lourenço; Petersen, Rodrigo Lima; de Moraes, José Rodrigo; Barboza, Eliane Porto.
Afiliación
  • Rodrigues DM; Department of Periodontology, National Institute of Dental Sciences (INCO 25), Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. diogomrcd@gmail.com.
  • Gluckman H; Private Practice, Cape Town, South Africa.
  • Pontes CC; Implant and Aesthetic Academy, Cape Town, South Africa.
  • Januário AL; Department of Periodontics, University of Pennsylvania School of Dental Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Petersen RL; Department of Oral Medicine and Periodontology, University of Western Cape School of Dentistry, Cape Town, South Africa.
  • de Moraes JR; Mouth-Body Research Institute and The Implant and Esthetic Academy, Cape Town, South Africa.
  • Barboza EP; Pirvate Practice, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Odontology ; 112(3): 988-1000, 2024 Jul.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38324124
ABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between soft tissue dimensions and radial root position (RRP) classification for immediate implant placement on maxillary anterior teeth. Maxillary anterior teeth (n = 420) were analyzed in the radial plane of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans. Each tooth was classified according to its RRP class I, (IA, IB); class II (IIA, IIB) class III; class IV, and class V. Soft tissue thickness at different landmarks, supracrestal soft tissue height, and crestal bone thickness were measured in CBCT. Keratinized tissue width was clinically measured. Gingival phenotype (thick or thin) was evaluated by transparency of the periodontal probe and at the landmark 2 mm from the gingival margin in CBCT. Class I tooth position accounted for 31.7%, class II for 45%, class III for 13.3%, class IV for 0.5%, and class V for 9.5%. The gingival phenotype was associated with RRP (χ2 test, p < 0.05). Soft tissue dimensions were significantly different over RRP classes (ANOVA and Tukey tests, p < 0.05). Types IA and IIA presented both thick soft and hard tissues. When planning immediate implants in the anterior maxilla, soft tissue dimensions evaluation should be incorporated into RRP classification to increase the accuracy and predictability of treatment outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Raíz del Diente / Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico / Carga Inmediata del Implante Dental / Encía / Maxilar Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Odontology Asunto de la revista: ODONTOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Brasil Pais de publicación: Japón
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Raíz del Diente / Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico / Carga Inmediata del Implante Dental / Encía / Maxilar Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Odontology Asunto de la revista: ODONTOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Brasil Pais de publicación: Japón