Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of Dopamine and Norepinephrine Use for the Treatment of Hypotension in Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients with Return of Spontaneous Circulation.
Li, Chao-Jui; Wu, Kuan-Han; Chen, Chien-Chih; Law, Yat-Yin; Chuang, Po-Chun; Chen, Yi-Chuan.
Afiliación
  • Li CJ; Department of Emergency Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
  • Wu KH; Department of Emergency Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
  • Chen CC; Department of Emergency Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
  • Law YY; Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
  • Chuang PC; Department of Orthopedics, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
  • Chen YC; Department of Emergency Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Emerg Med Int ; 2020: 7951025, 2020.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38264544
ABSTRACT
In patients experiencing out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), hypotension is common after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Both dopamine and norepinephrine are recommended as inotropic therapeutic agents. This study aimed to determine the impact of the use of these two medications on hypotension. This is a multicenter retrospective cohort study. OHCA patients with ROSC were divided into three groups according to the post resuscitation inotropic agent used for treatment in the emergency department, namely, dopamine, norepinephrine, and dopamine and norepinephrine combined therapy. Thirty-day survival and favorable neurologic performance were analyzed among the three study groups. The 30-day survival and favorable neurologic performance rates in the three study groups were 12.5%, 13.0%, and 6.8% as well as 4.9%, 4.3%, and 1.2%, respectively. On controlling the potential confounding factors by logistic regression, there was no difference between dopamine and norepinephrine treatment in survival and neurologic performance (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.0, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.48-2.06; aOR 0.8, 95% CI 0.28-2.53). The dopamine and norepinephrine combined treatment group had worse outcome (aOR 0.6, 95% CI 0.35-1.18; aOR 0.2, 95% CI 0.05-0.89). In conclusion, there was no significant difference in post-ROSC hypotension treatment between dopamine and norepinephrine in 30-day survival and favorable neurologic performance rates.

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Idioma: En Revista: Emerg Med Int Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Taiwán Pais de publicación: Egipto

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Idioma: En Revista: Emerg Med Int Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Taiwán Pais de publicación: Egipto