Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Conductivity variations and changes in serum sodium concentration during dialysis related to monitor switching.
Maduell, Francisco; Broseta, José Jesús; Casals, Joaquim; Gómez, Miquel; Rodas, Lida M; Arias-Guillén, Marta; Vera, Manel; Fontseré, Néstor.
Afiliación
  • Maduell F; Servicio de Nefrología y Trasplante Renal, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. Electronic address: fmaduell@clinic.cat.
  • Broseta JJ; Servicio de Nefrología y Trasplante Renal, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Casals J; Servicio de Nefrología y Trasplante Renal, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Gómez M; Servicio de Nefrología y Trasplante Renal, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Rodas LM; Servicio de Nefrología y Trasplante Renal, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Arias-Guillén M; Servicio de Nefrología y Trasplante Renal, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Vera M; Servicio de Nefrología y Trasplante Renal, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Fontseré N; Servicio de Nefrología y Trasplante Renal, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Nefrologia (Engl Ed) ; 43(6): 750-756, 2023.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38242765
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

The sodium gradient during hemodialysis sessions is one of the key factors in sodium balance in patients with dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease; however, until the appearance of the new monitors with sodium modules, the differences between prescribed and measured sodium have been understudied. The present study aimed to compare the impact on the measured conductivity and the initial and final plasma sodium after changing the 5008 Cordiax to the new 6008 Cordiax monitor. MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

106 patients on hemodialysis were included. Each patient underwent 2 dialysis sessions in which only the monitor was varied. The variables collected were dialysate, sodium and bicarbonate prescribed, real conductivity, initial and final plasma sodium measured, and the calculated sodium gradient (ΔPNa).

RESULTS:

The change of dialysis monitor showed small but statistically significant differences in the initial (138.14mmol/L with 5008 vs. 138.81mmol/L with 6008) and final plasma sodium (139.58mmol/L vs. 140.97mmol/L), as well as in the actual conductivity obtained (13.97 vs. 14.1mS/cm). The ΔPNa also increased significantly.

CONCLUSION:

The change from 5008 to 6008 monitor is associated with increased conductivity, leading the patient to end the sessions with higher plasma sodium and ΔPNa. Knowing and confirming this change will allow us to individualize the sodium prescription and avoid possible undesirable effects. It could be the preliminary study to explore the new sodium biosensor incorporated into the new generation of monitors.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Sodio / Diálisis Renal Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Nefrologia (Engl Ed) Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: España

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Sodio / Diálisis Renal Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Nefrologia (Engl Ed) Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: España