Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Comparing QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus Test and Tuberculin Skin Test for the Diagnosis of Latent Tuberculosis Infection in Immunocompetent Subjects in Colombia.
Navarro, Cristian E; Betancur, John E.
Afiliación
  • Navarro CE; School of Economic Sciences and School of Medicine, Universidad de Antioquia, Colombia, Medellín; Grupo de Investigación E.S.E Hospital Emiro Quintero Cañizares, Colombia, Ocaña. Electronic address: cristian.navarro@udea.edu.co.
  • Betancur JE; School of Economic Sciences and School of Medicine, Universidad de Antioquia, Colombia, Medellín.
Value Health Reg Issues ; 41: 54-62, 2024 May.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38241885
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To determine the cost-effectiveness of the QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) test versus the tuberculin skin test in diagnosing latent tuberculosis infection in immunocompetent subjects in the context of the Colombian healthcare system.

METHODS:

A hypothetical cohort of 2000 immunocompetent adults vaccinated with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin at birth who are asymptomatic for tuberculosis disease was simulated and included in a decision tree over a horizon of <1 year. The direct healthcare costs related to tests, antituberculosis treatment, and medical care were considered, and diagnostic performance was used as a measure of effectiveness. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was estimated, and univariate deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were carried out using 5000 simulations. The currency was the US dollar for the year 2022, with a cost-effectiveness threshold of $6666 USD (1 gross domestic product per capita for 2022).

RESULTS:

QFT-Plus was cost-effective with an ICER of $5687 USD for each correctly diagnosed case relative to a threshold of $6666 USD. In the deterministic analysis, QFT-Plus was cost-effective in half of the proposed scenarios. The variable that most affected the ICER was the prevalence of latent tuberculosis and test sensitivities. In the probabilistic analysis, QFT-Plus was cost-effective in 54.74% of the simulated scenarios, and tuberculin skin test was dominant in 13.84%.

CONCLUSIONS:

The study provides evidence of the cost-effectiveness of QFT-Plus compared with the tuberculin skin test in diagnosing latent tuberculosis infection in immunocompetent adults in the Colombian context.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Prueba de Tuberculina / Tuberculosis Latente Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Humans País/Región como asunto: America do sul / Colombia Idioma: En Revista: Value Health Reg Issues Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Prueba de Tuberculina / Tuberculosis Latente Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Humans País/Región como asunto: America do sul / Colombia Idioma: En Revista: Value Health Reg Issues Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos