Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Quality and risk management frameworks for biosolids: An assessment of current international practice.
Braine, Marilyn F; Kearnes, Matthew; Khan, Stuart J.
Afiliación
  • Braine MF; Water Research Centre, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of New South Wales, NSW 2052, Australia.
  • Kearnes M; School of Humanities & Language, University of New South Wales, NSW 2052, Australia.
  • Khan SJ; Water Research Centre, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of New South Wales, NSW 2052, Australia; School of Civil Engineering, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. Electronic address: stuart.khan@sydney.edu.au.
Sci Total Environ ; 915: 169953, 2024 Mar 10.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38215849
ABSTRACT
Biosolids, a product of wastewater treatment, provide a valuable resource, but to optimize the use of this resource it is necessary to manage risks posed to public health and the environment. Key requirements include identifying contaminant sources and providing barriers to ensure containment and treatment while maintaining the viability and value of biosolids products. Responsibility for managing biosolids is the remit of many stakeholders but primarily it rests with private and public wastewater facilities. The global variabilities in the way biosolids resources are acknowledged, applied, and managed are substantial. For example, some countries are increasing incineration because of their ability to remove contaminants while others have experienced a proportional decrease in incineration dependent on industrial resources or regarding resource recovery costs and needs. Some jurisdictions focus on energy recovery and others on land application. A risk management framework is a tool that may provide a suitable holistic approach to biosolids management. With this focus, current instruments in practice globally to manage biosolids were assessed for the degree to which they have adopted a risk management framework. To form a basis for this assessment a set of criteria was established by concept mapping several internationally recognized standards. Guidelines for a range of developed and developing countries were then assessed against these criteria. That process enabled the identification of which current practices were holistic in terms of applying biosolids risk management principles from production to end-use. Through this process, risk management gaps and vulnerabilities were identified. The results reveal that the incorporation of risk standards into risk management frameworks around the world is variable for the presence of risk criteria and the scale of detail provided. Contaminant concentrations need perspective within the changing risk landscape for stakeholders and the environment while jointly the opportunities and contaminant challenges require solutions that balance risks.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Gestión de Riesgos / Purificación del Agua Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Sci Total Environ Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia Pais de publicación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Gestión de Riesgos / Purificación del Agua Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Sci Total Environ Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia Pais de publicación: Países Bajos