Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A scoping review on the operationalization of intersectional health research methods in studies related to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Olanlesi-Aliu, Adedoyin; Tulli, Mia; Kemei, Janet; Bonifacio, Glenda; Reif, Linda C; Cardo, Valentina; Roche, Hannah; Hurley, Natasha; Salami, Bukola.
Afiliación
  • Olanlesi-Aliu A; Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
  • Tulli M; Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
  • Kemei J; Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
  • Bonifacio G; Women and Gender Studies, Arts and Science, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Canada.
  • Reif LC; CN Professor of International Trade, Law, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
  • Cardo V; Politics and Identity, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
  • Roche H; Department of English and Related Literature, University of York, Heslington, United Kingdom.
  • Hurley N; Dean of Humanities and Social Sciences, Memorial University¸Newfoundland and Labrador's University, St. John's Newfoundland, Canada.
  • Salami B; Intersections of Gender Signature Area, Intersections of Gender, Nursing, Fellow, Canadian Academy of Nursing, Health and Immigration Policies and Practices Research Program (HIPP), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being ; 19(1): 2302305, 2024 Dec.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38207090
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The COVID-19 pandemic began in early 2020 and became a global health crisis with devastating impacts. This scoping review maps the key findings of research about the pandemic that has operationalized intersectional research methods around the world. It also tracks how these studies have engaged with methodological tenets of oppression, comparison, relationality, complexity, and deconstruction.

METHODS:

Our search resulted in 14,487 articles, 5164 of which were duplicates, and 9297 studies that did not meet the inclusion criteria were excluded. In total, 14 articles were included in this review. We used thematic analysis to analyse themes within this work and Misra et al. (2021) intersectional research framework to analyse the uptake of intersectional methods within such studies.

RESULTS:

The research related to the COVID-19 pandemic globally is paying attention to issues around the financial impacts of the pandemic, discrimination, gendered impacts, impacts of and on social ties, and implications for mental health. We also found strong uptake of centring research in the context of oppression, but less attention is being paid to comparison, relationality, complexity, and deconstruction.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our findings show the importance of intersectional research within public health policy formation, as well as room for greater rigour in the use of intersectional methods.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Pandemias / COVID-19 Tipo de estudio: Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Pandemias / COVID-19 Tipo de estudio: Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos