Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Reliability of mixed dentition space analysis using a digital model obtained from an optical impression: a preliminary study.
Okamoto, Ayuko; Karibe, Hiroyuki; Tanaka, Satoshi; Kawakami, Tomomi; Shinya, Akikazu.
Afiliación
  • Okamoto A; Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Life Dentistry at Tokyo, The Nippon Dental University, 1-9-20 Fujimi Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 102-8159, Japan.
  • Karibe H; Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Life Dentistry at Tokyo, The Nippon Dental University, 1-9-20 Fujimi Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 102-8159, Japan. h-karibe@tky.ndu.ac.jp.
  • Tanaka S; Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Life Dentistry at Tokyo, The Nippon Dental University, 1-9-20 Fujimi Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 102-8159, Japan.
  • Kawakami T; Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Life Dentistry at Tokyo, The Nippon Dental University, 1-9-20 Fujimi Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 102-8159, Japan.
  • Shinya A; Department of Dental Materials Science, School of Life Dentistry at Tokyo, The Nippon Dental University, 1-9-20 Fujimi Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 102-8159, Japan.
BMC Res Notes ; 17(1): 12, 2024 Jan 03.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38167562
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

While mixed dentition space analysis is a common practice in pediatric dentistry, digital models created using an intraoral scanner are not as widely used in clinical settings. This preliminary study used a very small sample size with one reference model and aimed to (1) compare the accuracy of mixed dentition space analysis using a digital model obtained from an optical impression with that of conventional plaster model-based analysis and (2) assess inter-examiner differences.

RESULTS:

The space required for the mandibular permanent canine and premolars and arch length discrepancy were calculated using each model. The largest significant difference between plaster- and digital model-based analyses was identified when the right arch length discrepancy was considered (-0.49 mm; 95% confidence interval -0.95-0.03); however, the value was considered clinically insignificant. Significant inter-examiner differences were observed for six items of the plaster model; however, no such differences were observed when using the digital model. In conclusion, digital model space analysis may have the same level of accuracy as conventional plaster model analysis and likely results in smaller inter-examiner differences than plaster model analysis.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Imagenología Tridimensional / Dentición Mixta Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Child / Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Res Notes Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Japón Pais de publicación: Reino Unido
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Imagenología Tridimensional / Dentición Mixta Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Child / Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Res Notes Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Japón Pais de publicación: Reino Unido