Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Optimal timing of surgical intervention for penile fracture: a narrative review of the modern literature.
Bernstein, Ari P; Shayegh, Nader; Piraino, Javier; Ziegelmann, Matthew.
Afiliación
  • Bernstein AP; Department of Urology, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY 10016, United States.
  • Shayegh N; College of Medicine, Howard University, Washington, DC 20059, United States.
  • Piraino J; Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, United States.
  • Ziegelmann M; Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, United States.
Sex Med Rev ; 12(2): 230-239, 2024 Mar 26.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38163661
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Penile fracture is traditionally considered a surgical emergency warranting immediate repair with the goal to maximize long-term erectile function and minimize penile curvature. Nonetheless, consensus on the optimal timing for penile fracture repair remains to be elucidated and is the subject of continued research efforts.

OBJECTIVES:

This review aims to summarize the contemporary literature pertaining to optimal timing of penile fracture repair and associated outcomes.

METHODS:

We queried PubMed/MEDLINE and Google Scholar for relevant articles published between 2012 and 2022 to evaluate the most recent literature on the queried topic of early vs delayed intervention for penile fracture. All examined review articles were published within the last decade but may have included analyses of studies published prior to 2012. Reference lists of articles and reviews were manually reviewed to identify additional relevant articles.

RESULTS:

We identified 16 articles that met inclusion criteria 12 primary articles and 4 systematic reviews or meta-analyses. Importantly, definitions of early and delayed intervention varied greatly among studies, making quantitative comparison challenging. In summary, 6 primary studies and 2 systematic review articles favored early intervention. There were also 6 primary studies and 2 systematic review articles suggesting equivocal outcomes between early and delayed repair. No articles demonstrated improved outcomes with delayed repair relative to early intervention.

CONCLUSION:

Surgical intervention for penile fracture remains the gold standard, with superior long-term sexual and functional outcomes when compared with conservative management. Optimal timing of penile fracture repair remains to be elucidated with data limited by low incidence, resulting in small case series and a lack of randomized controlled trials. Nonetheless, recent data suggest that a brief delay in surgical intervention for patients presenting with penile fractures does not affect long-term sexual and functional outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Pene Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Sex Med Rev Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Pene Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Sex Med Rev Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Países Bajos