Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Penicillin Prophylaxis in Patients With Sickle Cell Disease Beyond Age 5 Years.
Eastep, Tyler G; Kendsersky, Rebecca M; Zook, Jessica; Moore, Astrela.
Afiliación
  • Eastep TG; Department of Pharmacy (TGE, RMK, JZ, AM), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Kendsersky RM; Department of Pharmacy (TGE, RMK, JZ, AM), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Zook J; Department of Pharmacy (TGE, RMK, JZ, AM), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Moore A; Department of Pharmacy (TGE, RMK, JZ, AM), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther ; 28(6): 519-523, 2023.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38130352
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) are at increased risk for invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae. Immunization and antimicrobial prophylaxis may prevent this complication, and landmark clinical trials support discontinuation of antimicrobial prophylaxis at age 5 years. However, antimicrobial prophylaxis continues in some patients indefinitely. The objective of this study was to evaluate the incidence of culture-positive IPD and other infections in the setting of penicillin prophylaxis in the pediatric SCD population.

METHODS:

This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of patients with SCD who continued antimicrobial prophylaxis with penicillin, compared with those whose antimicrobial prophylaxis was discontinued. Included patients were aged 5 to 18 years during the study period and had no history of IPD or surgical splenectomy. Patient charts were reviewed for demographics, immunizations, penicillin prescription history, and microbiologic culture data.

RESULTS:

Antimicrobial prophylaxis continued beyond age 5 years in 65% of patients, a higher percentage of whom had hemoglobin SS or S beta-zero disease. No patients whose antimicrobial prophylaxis was discontinued experienced IPD; 1 patient who continued antimicrobial prophylaxis died of S pneumoniae sepsis. Rates of other infections were comparable between groups (21% in prophylaxis versus 18% in no prophylaxis).

CONCLUSIONS:

These results support appropriate de-prescribing of antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients with SCD who are not at high risk for IPD. Further multicenter studies are needed to evaluate consequences of antimicrobial prophylaxis with alternative agents on antibiotic resistance, examine provider rationale for continuation of antimicrobial prophylaxis, and assess quality of life effects (e.g., medication adherence, adverse drug reactions) of antimicrobial prophylaxis.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Panamá Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Panamá Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos