Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Transfer learning for the generalization of artificial intelligence in breast cancer detection: a case-control study.
Africano, Gerson; Arponen, Otso; Rinta-Kiikka, Irina; Pertuz, Said.
Afiliación
  • Africano G; School of Electrical, Electronics and Telecommunications Engineering, Universidad Industrial de Santander, Bucaramanga, Colombia.
  • Arponen O; Department of Radiology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
  • Rinta-Kiikka I; Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
  • Pertuz S; Department of Radiology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
Acta Radiol ; 65(4): 334-340, 2024 Apr.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38115699
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Some researchers have questioned whether artificial intelligence (AI) systems maintain their performance when used for women from populations not considered during the development of the system.

PURPOSE:

To evaluate the impact of transfer learning as a way of improving the generalization of AI systems in the detection of breast cancer. MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

This retrospective case-control Finnish study involved 191 women diagnosed with breast cancer and 191 matched healthy controls. We selected a state-of-the-art AI system for breast cancer detection trained using a large US dataset. The selected baseline system was evaluated in two experimental settings. First, we examined our private Finnish sample as an independent test set that had not been considered in the development of the system (unseen population). Second, the baseline system was retrained to attempt to improve its performance in the unseen population by means of transfer learning. To analyze performance, we used areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) with DeLong's test.

RESULTS:

Two versions of the baseline system were considered ImageOnly and Heatmaps. The ImageOnly and Heatmaps versions yielded mean AUC values of 0.82±0.008 and 0.88±0.003 in the US dataset and 0.56 (95% CI=0.50-0.62) and 0.72 (95% CI=0.67-0.77) when evaluated in the unseen population, respectively. The retrained systems achieved AUC values of 0.61 (95% CI=0.55-0.66) and 0.69 (95% CI=0.64-0.75), respectively. There was no statistical difference between the baseline system and the retrained system.

CONCLUSION:

Transfer learning with a small study sample did not yield a significant improvement in the generalization of the system.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Mama / Inteligencia Artificial Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Acta Radiol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Colombia Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Mama / Inteligencia Artificial Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Acta Radiol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Colombia Pais de publicación: Reino Unido