Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Health Service Utilisation of People Living with Psychosis: Validity of Self-report Compared with Administrative Data in a Randomised Controlled Trial.
Dolar, Vergil; Chatterton, Mary Lou; Le, Long Khanh-Dao; Mihalopoulos, Cathrine; Thomas, Neil; Engel, Lidia.
Afiliación
  • Dolar V; Deakin Health Economics, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
  • Chatterton ML; Deakin Health Economics, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
  • Le LK; Monash University Health Economics Group, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Mihalopoulos C; Monash University Health Economics Group, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Thomas N; Deakin Health Economics, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
  • Engel L; Monash University Health Economics Group, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Appl Health Econ Health Policy ; 22(2): 255-264, 2024 Mar.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37985649
BACKGROUND: Self-reported service use informs resource utilisation and cost estimates, though its validity for use within economic evaluations is uncertain. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to assess agreement in health resource-use measurement between self-reported and administrative data across different resource categories, over time and between different recall periods by subgroups among Australians living with psychosis. METHODS: Data were obtained for 104 participants with psychotic disorders from a randomised controlled trial. Agreement between self-reported resource-use questionnaires and administrative data on community-based services and medication use was assessed through estimating differences of group mean number of visits and medications used and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) over multiple time periods. RESULTS: ICC showed moderate agreement across most time periods for general practitioners, psychiatrists and mental health medications. No clear trends were discernible over time, between varying lengths of recall periods nor across participant subgroups. CONCLUSION: Despite poor agreement, when measuring visits to psychologists and other health professionals, small overall differences in group mean number of visits indicate that self-reported data may still be valid for use in economic evaluations in people living with psychosis.
Asunto(s)
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Trastornos Psicóticos / Atención a la Salud / Pueblos de Australasia / Servicios de Salud Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Oceania Idioma: En Revista: Appl Health Econ Health Policy Asunto de la revista: SAUDE PUBLICA / SERVICOS DE SAUDE Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia Pais de publicación: Nueva Zelanda
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Trastornos Psicóticos / Atención a la Salud / Pueblos de Australasia / Servicios de Salud Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Oceania Idioma: En Revista: Appl Health Econ Health Policy Asunto de la revista: SAUDE PUBLICA / SERVICOS DE SAUDE Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia Pais de publicación: Nueva Zelanda