Prediction, prognosis, and professionalism in perioperative medicine.

van Lier, Felix; Hoeks, Sanne; Pearse, Rupert M

van Lier, Felix; Hoeks, Sanne; Pearse, Rupert M.

Afiliación

van Lier F; Department of Anesthesia, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: f.vanlier@erasmusmc.nl.
Hoeks S; Department of Anesthesia, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Pearse RM; Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

Br J Anaesth ; 132(1): 13-14, 2024 Jan.

Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37977955

RESUMEN

Guidelines provide a framework to take better care of our patients. They are published by different professional groups and are based on all the research done for us by hardworking colleagues. Compiling a guideline is an enormous amount of work and is generally done with the utmost care. However, recommendations often require a subjective interpretation of published research, where personal and academic interests can influence the outcome. We discuss two recently published guidelines on perioperative cardiovascular assessment that led to different conclusions on some important areas of patient care.

Asunto(s)

Enfermedades Cardiovasculares; Medicina Perioperatoria; Humanos; Atención Perioperativa; Profesionalismo; Pronóstico

Palabras clave

biomarker; cardiovascular assessment; cardiovascular disease; guidelines; noncardiac surgery; perioperative medicine; postoperative care

Texto completo

Añadir a Mi BVS

Imprimir

XML

PubMed Links

Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Enfermedades Cardiovasculares / Medicina Perioperatoria Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Br J Anaesth Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo

Añadir a Mi BVS

Imprimir

XML

PubMed Links

Buscar en Google