Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Is a pregnancy following a second trimester uterine evacuation associated with increased adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes?
Kalifa, Tal Margaliot; Sela, Hen Y; Joseph, Jordanna; Grisaru-Granovsky, Sorina; Khatib, Fayez; Rottenstreich, Misgav.
Afiliación
  • Kalifa TM; Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, affiliated with the Hebrew University School of Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel. Electronic address: tal.margaliot@mail.huji.ac.il.
  • Sela HY; Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, affiliated with the Hebrew University School of Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel.
  • Joseph J; Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, affiliated with the Hebrew University School of Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel.
  • Grisaru-Granovsky S; Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, affiliated with the Hebrew University School of Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel.
  • Khatib F; Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, affiliated with the Hebrew University School of Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel.
  • Rottenstreich M; Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, affiliated with the Hebrew University School of Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel; Department of Nursing, Jerusalem College of Technology, Jerusalem, Israel.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 292: 25-29, 2024 Jan.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37951114
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate maternal and neonatal outcomes of pregnancies following a uterine evacuation in the second trimester, in comparison to a first trimester spontaneous pregnancy loss. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of data of women who conceived ≤6 months following a uterine evacuation due to a spontaneous pregnancy loss and subsequently delivered in a single tertiary medical center between 2016 and 2021. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were compared between women with second trimester (14-23 weeks) and first trimester (<14 weeks) pregnancy loss. The primary outcome of this study was the preterm delivery (<37 weeks) rate. Secondary outcomes were adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Univariate analysis was followed by multiple logistic regression models; adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. RESULTS: During the study period, 1365 women met the inclusion criteria. Of those, 272 (19.9 %) women gave birth following a second trimester uterine evacuation and 1093 (80.1 %) women following a first trimester uterine evacuation. There were no demographic differences between the two groups. No difference was found in the preterm delivery rate in the subsequent pregnancy (5.1 % vs. 5.3 %, p = 0.91), further confirmed in the multivariate analysis [aOR 1.02 (0.53-1.94), p = 0.96]. No differences were identified with respect to other maternal and neonatal parameters examined, including hypertension disorders of pregnancy, third stage placental complications, mode of delivery and neonatal birth weight. CONCLUSION: Pregnancy conceived shortly after second trimester uterine evacuation as compared to first trimester, confers no additional risk for preterm delivery or other adverse perinatal outcomes. Further studies to strengthen these findings are needed.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Aborto Espontáneo / Nacimiento Prematuro Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Newborn / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Irlanda

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Aborto Espontáneo / Nacimiento Prematuro Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Newborn / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Irlanda