Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Improved performance of an intensive care unit after changing the admission triage model.
Larangeira, Alexandre S; Mezzaroba, Ana Luiza; Morakami, Fernanda K; Cardoso, Lucienne T Q; Matsuo, Tiemi; Grion, Cintia M C.
Afiliación
  • Larangeira AS; Intensive Care Division, Londrina State University, Londrina, Brazil.
  • Mezzaroba AL; Internal Medicine Department, Londrina State University, Rua Robert Koch 60, Vila Operária, Londrina, Paraná, 86038-440, Brazil.
  • Morakami FK; Intensive Care Division, Londrina State University, Londrina, Brazil.
  • Cardoso LTQ; Internal Medicine Department, Londrina State University, Rua Robert Koch 60, Vila Operária, Londrina, Paraná, 86038-440, Brazil.
  • Matsuo T; Statistics Department, Londrina State University, Londrina, Brazil.
  • Grion CMC; Internal Medicine Department, Londrina State University, Rua Robert Koch 60, Vila Operária, Londrina, Paraná, 86038-440, Brazil. cintiagrion@hotmail.com.
Sci Rep ; 13(1): 17043, 2023 10 09.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37813948
The aim of this study is to analyze the effect of implementing a prioritization triage model for admission to an intensive care unit on the outcome of critically ill patients. Retrospective longitudinal study of adult patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) carried out from January 2013 to December 2017. The primary outcome considered was vital status at hospital discharge. Patients were divided into period 1 (chronological triage) during the years 2013 and 2014 and period 2 (prioritization triage) during the years 2015-2017. A total of 1227 patients in period 1 and 2056 in period 2 were analyzed. Patients admitted in period 2 were older (59.8 years) compared to period 1 (57.3 years; p < 0.001) with less chronic diseases (13.6% vs. 19.2%; p = 0.001), and higher median APACHE II score (21.0 vs. 18.0; p < 0.001)) and TISS 28 score (28.0 vs. 27.0; p < 0.001). In period 2, patients tended to stay in the ICU for a shorter time (8.5 ± 11.8 days) compared to period 1 (9.6 ± 16.0 days; p = 0.060) and had lower mortality at ICU (32.8% vs. 36.9%; p = 0.016) and hospital discharge (44.2% vs. 47.8%; p = 0.041). The change in the triage model from a chronological model to a prioritization model resulted in improvement in the performance of the ICU and reduction in the hospital mortality rate.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Triaje / Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Sci Rep Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Brasil Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Triaje / Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Sci Rep Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Brasil Pais de publicación: Reino Unido