Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Reliability and validity of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment's auditory items (MoCA-22).
Lord, Alinda Rafaela; Amitrano, Nicholas R; González, David Andrés.
Afiliación
  • Lord AR; Department of Psychology, Adler University, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Amitrano NR; Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders Care Program, Department of Neurological Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • González DA; Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders Care Program, Department of Neurological Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Clin Neuropsychol ; 38(3): 783-798, 2024 04.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37743611
Objective: To evaluate the latent structure, internal consistency, convergent and discriminant validity, diagnostic accuracy, and criterion validity of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment's auditory items (MoCA-22), which has previously been evaluated in small samples if at all. Methods: 11,284 participants completed the MoCA over 1-2 visits to an Alzheimer Disease Research Center (Mage = 69.2, Meducation = 15.9, 57.6% women, 92.4% non-Hispanic white). MoCA-22 items were probed with alpha, omega, confirmatory factor analysis, and test-retest correlations. Scores were related to measures of neurocognition, daily functioning, behavioral-psychological symptoms (BPS), and vision performance for convergent-discriminant and criterion validity. Dementia stage was used to calculate area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC-ROC) curves and cutoffs for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia. Results: A single-factor had good fit (CFI = .961; TLI = .945; RMSEA = .061; SRMR = .031), with good internal consistency (Omega total = .83) and test-retest consistency (ICC = .92 at 2.7 years). The strongest convergent correlations were with general cognition and executive functioning, while discriminant validity was demonstrated with its weakest and negative correlations being with BPS. There was strong classification accuracy in distinguishing MCI from normal cognition (AUC = .79; optimal cutoff point < 18), and mild-to-moderate dementia from MCI (AUC = .85; optimal cutoff point < 13). Furthermore, the MoCA-22 had negligible-to-small differences among those with and without vision limitations. Conclusions: These findings add to the evidence of the MoCA-22's utility and it serves as a useful cognitive screening tool with sound reliability and validity.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Enfermedad de Alzheimer / Disfunción Cognitiva Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Clin Neuropsychol Asunto de la revista: NEUROLOGIA / PSICOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Enfermedad de Alzheimer / Disfunción Cognitiva Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Clin Neuropsychol Asunto de la revista: NEUROLOGIA / PSICOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Reino Unido