Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Supervised Risk Predictor of Breast Cancer Based on Intrinsic Subtypes.
Parker, Joel S; Mullins, Michael; Cheang, Maggie C U; Leung, Samuel; Voduc, David; Vickery, Tammi; Davies, Sherri; Fauron, Christiane; He, Xiaping; Hu, Zhiyuan; Quackenbush, John F; Stijleman, Inge J; Palazzo, Juan; Marron, J S; Nobel, Andrew B; Mardis, Elaine; Nielsen, Torsten O; Ellis, Matthew J; Perou, Charles M; Bernard, Philip S.
Afiliación
  • Parker JS; From the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center and Departments of Genetics, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, and Department of Statistics and Operations Research, Carolina Center for Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Department of Pathology, University
  • Mullins M; From the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center and Departments of Genetics, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, and Department of Statistics and Operations Research, Carolina Center for Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Department of Pathology, University
  • Cheang MCU; From the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center and Departments of Genetics, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, and Department of Statistics and Operations Research, Carolina Center for Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Department of Pathology, University
  • Leung S; From the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center and Departments of Genetics, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, and Department of Statistics and Operations Research, Carolina Center for Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Department of Pathology, University
  • Voduc D; From the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center and Departments of Genetics, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, and Department of Statistics and Operations Research, Carolina Center for Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Department of Pathology, University
  • Vickery T; From the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center and Departments of Genetics, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, and Department of Statistics and Operations Research, Carolina Center for Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Department of Pathology, University
  • Davies S; From the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center and Departments of Genetics, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, and Department of Statistics and Operations Research, Carolina Center for Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Department of Pathology, University
  • Fauron C; From the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center and Departments of Genetics, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, and Department of Statistics and Operations Research, Carolina Center for Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Department of Pathology, University
  • He X; From the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center and Departments of Genetics, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, and Department of Statistics and Operations Research, Carolina Center for Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Department of Pathology, University
  • Hu Z; From the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center and Departments of Genetics, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, and Department of Statistics and Operations Research, Carolina Center for Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Department of Pathology, University
  • Quackenbush JF; From the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center and Departments of Genetics, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, and Department of Statistics and Operations Research, Carolina Center for Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Department of Pathology, University
  • Stijleman IJ; From the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center and Departments of Genetics, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, and Department of Statistics and Operations Research, Carolina Center for Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Department of Pathology, University
  • Palazzo J; From the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center and Departments of Genetics, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, and Department of Statistics and Operations Research, Carolina Center for Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Department of Pathology, University
  • Marron JS; From the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center and Departments of Genetics, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, and Department of Statistics and Operations Research, Carolina Center for Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Department of Pathology, University
  • Nobel AB; From the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center and Departments of Genetics, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, and Department of Statistics and Operations Research, Carolina Center for Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Department of Pathology, University
  • Mardis E; From the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center and Departments of Genetics, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, and Department of Statistics and Operations Research, Carolina Center for Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Department of Pathology, University
  • Nielsen TO; From the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center and Departments of Genetics, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, and Department of Statistics and Operations Research, Carolina Center for Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Department of Pathology, University
  • Ellis MJ; From the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center and Departments of Genetics, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, and Department of Statistics and Operations Research, Carolina Center for Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Department of Pathology, University
  • Perou CM; From the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center and Departments of Genetics, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, and Department of Statistics and Operations Research, Carolina Center for Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Department of Pathology, University
  • Bernard PS; From the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center and Departments of Genetics, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, and Department of Statistics and Operations Research, Carolina Center for Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Department of Pathology, University
J Clin Oncol ; 41(26): 4192-4199, 2023 Sep 10.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37672882
PURPOSE: To improve on current standards for breast cancer prognosis and prediction of chemotherapy benefit by developing a risk model that incorporates the gene expression-based "intrinsic" subtypes luminal A, luminal B, HER2-enriched, and basal-like. METHODS: A 50-gene subtype predictor was developed using microarray and quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction data from 189 prototype samples. Test sets from 761 patients (no systemic therapy) were evaluated for prognosis, and 133 patients were evaluated for prediction of pathologic complete response (pCR) to a taxane and anthracycline regimen. RESULTS: The intrinsic subtypes as discrete entities showed prognostic significance (P = 2.26E-12) and remained significant in multivariable analyses that incorporated standard parameters (estrogen receptor status, histologic grade, tumor size, and node status). A prognostic model for node-negative breast cancer was built using intrinsic subtype and clinical information. The C-index estimate for the combined model (subtype and tumor size) was a significant improvement on either the clinicopathologic model or subtype model alone. The intrinsic subtype model predicted neoadjuvant chemotherapy efficacy with a negative predictive value for pCR of 97%. CONCLUSION: Diagnosis by intrinsic subtype adds significant prognostic and predictive information to standard parameters for patients with breast cancer. The prognostic properties of the continuous risk score will be of value for the management of node-negative breast cancers. The subtypes and risk score can also be used to assess the likelihood of efficacy from neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Oncol Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Oncol Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos