Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Balancing Ambitions and Realities: Stakeholder Perspectives on Jurisdictional Approach Outcomes in Sabah's Forests.
Ng, Julia Su Chen; Chervier, Colas; Carmenta, Rachel; Samdin, Zaiton; Azhar, Badrul; Karsenty, Alain.
Afiliación
  • Ng JSC; University Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia. julia.ngsuchen@gmail.com.
  • Chervier C; ABIES Doctoral School, AgroParisTech, Palaiseau, France. julia.ngsuchen@gmail.com.
  • Carmenta R; Centre de Coop´eration Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le D´eveloppement (CIRAD), UR Forests and Societies, Environnements et Soci´et´es, Montpellier, France.
  • Samdin Z; Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor, Indonesia.
  • Azhar B; School of International Development, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
  • Karsenty A; University Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.
Environ Manage ; 73(1): 259-273, 2024 Jan.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37667018
The jurisdictional approach concept emerged in response to the widespread failure of sectoral forest conservation projects. Despite its increasing popularity, understanding jurisdictional approach outcomes is challenging, given that many remain in either the formation or implementation stage. Furthermore, diverse stakeholders hold different perspectives on what exactly a jurisdictional approach is intended to pursue. These different perspectives are important to unravel, as having a shared understanding of the outcomes is important to build the critical support needed for it. This study aims to add to the limited evidence with a case study in Sabah, Malaysia, which is committed to addressing a leading deforestation driver (palm oil) through sustainability certification in a jurisdiction. We used Q-methodology to explore stakeholder perceptions, revealing three distinct perspectives regarding what outcomes jurisdictional approaches should pursue. We asked about outcomes achievable within ten years (2022-2032) and considering real-world constraints. We found different perspectives regarding economic, environmental, governance, and smallholders' welfare outcomes. However, we found consensus among stakeholders about some outcomes: (i) that achieving zero-deforestation is untenable, (ii) that issuing compensation or incentives to private land owners to not convert forests into plantations is unrealistic, (iii) that the human well-being of plantation workers could improve through better welfare, and (iv) the free, prior and informed consent given by local communities being required legally. The findings offer insights into key stakeholders' perceptions of the deliverables of jurisdictional approaches and the difficulty of achieving its objectives under real-world constraints.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Bosques / Conservación de los Recursos Naturales Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Environ Manage Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Malasia Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Bosques / Conservación de los Recursos Naturales Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Environ Manage Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Malasia Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos