BACKGROUND: Identification of non-diabetic renal disease (NDRD) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) may help tailor treatment. Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging (IVIM-DWI) is a promising tool to evaluate renal function but its potential role in the clinical differentiation between diabetic nephropathy (DN) and NDRD remains unclear. PURPOSE: To investigate the added role of IVIM-DWI in the differential diagnosis between DN and NDRD in patients with T2DM. STUDY TYPE: Prospective. POPULATION: Sixty-three patients with T2DM (ages: 22-69 years, 17 females) confirmed by renal biopsy divided into two subgroups (28 DN and 35 NDRD). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3 T/ T2 weighted imaging (T2WI), and intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging (IVIM-DWI). ASSESSMENT: The parameters derived from IVIM-DWI (true diffusion coefficient [D], pseudo-diffusion coefficient [D*], and pseudo-diffusion fraction [f]) were calculated for the cortex and medulla, respectively. The clinical indexes related to renal function (eg cystatin C, etc.) and diabetes (eg diabetic retinopathy [DR], fasting blood glucose, etc.) were measured and calculated within 1 week before MRI scanning. The clinical model based on clinical indexes and the IVIM-based model based on IVIM parameters and clinical indexes were established and evaluated, respectively. STATISTICAL TESTS: Student's t-test; Mann-Whitney U test; Fisher's exact test; Chi-squared test; Intraclass correlation coefficient; Receiver operating characteristic analysis; Hosmer-Lemeshow test; DeLong's test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The cortex D*, DR, and cystatin C values were identified as independent predictors of NDRD in multivariable analysis. The IVIM-based model, comprising DR, cystatin C, and cortex D*, significantly outperformed the clinical model containing only DR, and cystatin C (AUC = 0.934, 0.845, respectively). DATA CONCLUSION: The IVIM parameters, especially the renal cortex D* value, might serve as novel indicators in the differential diagnosis between DN and NDRD in patients with T2DM. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.