Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Accuracy of Bladder Scanner in Measuring Bladder Volumes in Postpartum Women.
Zheng, Veronica Jierong; Geynisman-Tan, Julia; Knoll, Justin; Kenton, Kimberly; Brown, Oluwateniola.
Afiliación
  • Zheng VJ; From the Feinberg School of Medicine.
  • Geynisman-Tan J; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
  • Knoll J; Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.
  • Kenton K; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
  • Brown O; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Urogynecology (Phila) ; 29(9): 777-783, 2023 09 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37607312
IMPORTANCE: Ultrasound bladder scanners may provide a less invasive method to measure postpartum urinary volume, but their accuracy must be validated. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of a bladder scanner in measuring bladder volumes in postpartum women. The secondary objective was to evaluate the effect of obesity on scanner accuracy. STUDY DESIGN: This prospective cohort study included women older than 18 years who gave birth vaginally at term gestation. After delivery, we obtained 3 sequential measurements of the bladder volume using an ultrasound bladder scanner. We then measured true bladder volume by transurethral catheterization. The primary outcome was the absolute difference between the bladder scanner volume and the catheterized volume. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare absolute median difference between the bladder scan volume and true catheter volume. Repeated-measures analysis of variance and linear regression were used to evaluate the effect of obesity on the accuracy of the bladder scanner. RESULTS: We enrolled 70 patients (61.4% nulliparous, 38.6% multiparous). One delivery was vacuum-assisted, 4 were forceps-assisted, and 65 were spontaneous vaginal. The median age was 34 years, and median body mass index was 30.5. Median difference between bladder scanner and catheter volume was 42.7 mL (P < 0.001), with the scanner underestimating true volume 82.9% of the time. The scanner was less accurate in patients with a body mass index ≥ 30 (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The bladder scanner is less accurate than catheterized urine volume. However, the median difference between the bladder scanner and the catheterized volume is 42.7 mL, making it suitable for clinical use. Accuracy deteriorates in obese patients.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Vejiga Urinaria / Periodo Posparto Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: Urogynecology (Phila) Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Vejiga Urinaria / Periodo Posparto Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: Urogynecology (Phila) Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos