Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Healthcare utilization and catastrophic health expenditure in rural Tanzania: does voluntary health insurance matter?
Kagaigai, Alphoncina; Anaeli, Amani; Grepperud, Sverre; Mori, Amani Thomas.
Afiliación
  • Kagaigai A; Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 0315, Oslo, Norway. akagaigai@gmail.com.
  • Anaeli A; School of Public Health and Social Sciences, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, P.O. Box 65001, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania. akagaigai@gmail.com.
  • Grepperud S; School of Public Health and Social Sciences, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, P.O. Box 65001, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania.
  • Mori AT; Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 0315, Oslo, Norway.
BMC Public Health ; 23(1): 1567, 2023 08 17.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37592242
BACKGROUND: Over 150 million people, mostly from low and middle-income countries (LMICs) suffer from catastrophic health expenditure (CHE) every year because of high out-of-pocket (OOP) payments. In Tanzania, OOP payments account for about a quarter of the total health expenditure. This paper compares healthcare utilization and the incidence of CHE among improved Community Health Fund (iCHF) members and non-members in central Tanzania. METHODS: A survey was conducted in 722 households in Bahi and Chamwino districts in Dodoma region. CHE was defined as a household health expenditure exceeding 40% of total non-food expenditure (capacity to pay). Concentration index (CI) and logistic regression were used to assess the socioeconomic inequalities in the distribution of healthcare utilization and the association between CHE and iCHF enrollment status, respectively. RESULTS: 50% of the members and 29% of the non-members utilized outpatient care in the previous month, while 19% (members) and 15% (non-members) utilized inpatient care in the previous twelve months. The degree of inequality for utilization of inpatient care was higher (insured, CI = 0.38; noninsured CI = 0.29) than for outpatient care (insured, CI = 0.09; noninsured CI = 0.16). Overall, 15% of the households experienced CHE, however, when disaggregated by enrollment status, the incidence of CHE was 13% and 15% among members and non-members, respectively. The odds of iCHF-members incurring CHE were 0.4 times less compared to non-members (OR = 0.41, 95%CI: 0.27-0.63). The key determinants of CHE were iCHF enrollment status, health status, socioeconomic status, chronic illness, and the utilization of inpatient and outpatient care. CONCLUSION: The utilization of healthcare services was higher while the incidence of CHE was lower among households enrolled in the iCHF insurance scheme relative to those not enrolled. More studies are needed to establish the reasons for the relatively high incidence of CHE among iCHF members and the low degree of healthcare utilization among households with low socioeconomic status.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Aceptación de la Atención de Salud / Gastos en Salud Tipo de estudio: Health_economic_evaluation Aspecto: Equity_inequality / Implementation_research / Patient_preference Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Africa Idioma: En Revista: BMC Public Health Asunto de la revista: SAUDE PUBLICA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Noruega Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Aceptación de la Atención de Salud / Gastos en Salud Tipo de estudio: Health_economic_evaluation Aspecto: Equity_inequality / Implementation_research / Patient_preference Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Africa Idioma: En Revista: BMC Public Health Asunto de la revista: SAUDE PUBLICA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Noruega Pais de publicación: Reino Unido