Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Quantification of needle angles for lumbar medial branch denervation targeting the posterior half of the superior articular process: an osteological study.
Tran, John; Campisi, Emma S; Agur, Anne M R; Loh, Eldon.
Afiliación
  • Tran J; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Western University, London, ON N6C 0A7, Canada.
  • Campisi ES; Parkwood Institute Research, Lawson Health Research Institute, London, ON N6C 0A7, Canada.
  • Agur AMR; Division of Anatomy, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada.
  • Loh E; Division of Anatomy, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada.
Pain Med ; 25(1): 13-19, 2024 Jan 04.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37578435
BACKGROUND: Lumbar medial branch radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a common intervention to manage chronic axial low back pain originating from the facet joints. A more parasagittal approach targeting the posterior half of the lateral neck of superior articular process (SAP) was previously proposed. However, specific needle angles to achieve parallel placement at this target site have not been investigated. OBJECTIVE: To quantify and compare the needle angles, on posterior and lateral views, to achieve parallel placement of electrodes along the medial branch at the posterior half of the lateral neck of SAP at each lumbar vertebral level (L1-L5) and sacrum. DESIGN: Osteological Study. METHODS: Twelve disarticulated lumbosacral spines (n = 72 individual bones) were used in this study. Needles were placed along the periosteum of the posterior half of the lateral neck of SAP, bilaterally and photographed. Mean needle angles for each vertebral level (L1-L5) and sacrum were quantified, and statistical differences were analyzed. RESULTS: The posterior view provided the degrees of lateral displacement from the parasagittal plane (abduction angle), while the lateral view provided the degrees of declination (cranial-to-caudal angle) of the needle. Mean needle angles at each level varied, ranging from 5.63 ± 5.76° to 14.50 ± 14.24° (abduction angle, posterior view) and 40.17 ± 7.32° to 64.10 ± 9.73° (cranial-to-caudal angle, lateral view). In posterior view, a < 10-degree needle angle interval was most frequently identified (57.0% of needle placements). In lateral view, the 40-50-degree (L1-L2), 50-60-degree (L3-L5), and 60-70-degree (sacrum) needle angle intervals occurred most frequently (54.2%, 50.0%, and 41.7% of needle placements, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Targeting the posterior half of the lateral neck of SAP required <10-degree angulation from parasagittal plane in majority of cases. However, variability of needle angles suggests a standard "one-size-fits-all" approach may not be the optimal technique.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Dolor de la Región Lumbar / Articulación Cigapofisaria Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Pain Med Asunto de la revista: NEUROLOGIA / PSICOFISIOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Dolor de la Región Lumbar / Articulación Cigapofisaria Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Pain Med Asunto de la revista: NEUROLOGIA / PSICOFISIOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá Pais de publicación: Reino Unido