OBJECTIVES: The relationship between heat stress, chronic kidney diseases and acute kidney injury has been documented in cross-sectional studies with agricultural workers. However, only a few international studies have assessed renal function in agricultural workers longitudinally. Our research study, Occupational Heat Exposure and Renal Dysfunction (OHEaRD) is the first longitudinal study in the U.S. that monitored renal function in agricultural workers five times over the course of 32-months. The main objectives of this study were to evaluate the rate of retention and identify predictors associated with retention in a longitudinal study with agricultural workers. METHODS: In January 2020, we enrolled 119 Florida agricultural workers to observe on 5 workdays over 32 months. Retention was defined by the number of follow-up visits that a participant attended, the consistency of visit attendance, and attendance at the last visit. Participants were provided hemoglobin A1C, lipid panel, creatinine measurement, glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), blood pressure, and body mass index results and an incentive gift card were handed out to participants at each visit. RESULTS: Four enrollees did not participate on any workday, thus analysis concentrated on the remaining 115 participants. The majority of participants (64%) completed the 32-month study, 78% completed at least 4 visits, and 55% completed all 5 visits. The statistically significant predictors of higher retention among this study were being older in age (p=0.02), Mexican nationality (p=0.004), working in ferneries (p=0.009), more years working in agriculture (p=0.02), and higher total cholesterol (p=0.02). Appreciation for the health tests was associated with greater participation at the final visit (p=0.01). CONCLUSION: Retention in longitudinal studies is crucial to better understand kidney disease among agricultural workers, an understudied population. Participants reported valuing the access to health results, indicating that implementing point-of-care health screenings and providing the health results to each participant is a good retention strategy. There was some evidence that a participant living with or being related to a fellow co-participant could impact retention as they either showed up or missed visits together, suggesting recruiting from the same household may reduce retention.