Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Tourniquet Use in the Prehospital Setting.
McCarthy, Elizabeth M; Burns, Kevin; Schuster, Kevin M; Cone, David C.
Afiliación
  • McCarthy EM; Frank H. Netter MD School of Medicine, Quinnipiac University, North Haven, Connecticut.
  • Burns K; School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
  • Schuster KM; School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
  • Cone DC; School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
Prehosp Emerg Care ; 28(3): 531-535, 2024.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37486096
PURPOSE: Tourniquets are a mainstay of life-saving hemorrhage control. The US military has documented the safety and effectiveness of tourniquet use in combat settings. In civilian settings, events such as the Boston Marathon bombing and mass shootings show that tourniquets are necessary and life-saving entities that must be used correctly and whenever indicated. Much less research has been done on tourniquet use in civilian settings compared to military settings. The purpose of this study is to describe the prehospital use of tourniquets in a regional EMS system served by a single trauma center. METHODS: All documented cases of prehospital tourniquet use from 2015 to 2020 were identified via a search of EMS, emergency department, and inpatient records, and reviewed by the lead investigator. The primary outcomes were duration of tourniquet placement, success of hemorrhage control, and complications; secondary outcomes included time of day (by EMS arrival time), transport interval, extremity involved, who placed/removed the tourniquet, and mechanism of injury. RESULTS: Of 182 patients with 185 tourniquets applied, duration of application was available for 52, with a median (IQR) of 43 (56) minutes. Hemorrhage control was achieved in all but two cases (96%). Three cases (5.8%) required more than one tourniquet. Complications included five cases of temporary paresthesia, one case of ecchymosis, two cases of fasciotomy, and two cases of compression nerve injury. The serious complication rate was 7.7% (4/52). Time of day was daytime (08:01-16:00) = 15 (31.9%), evening (16:01-00:00) = 27 (57.4%), and night (00:01- 08:00) = 5 (10.6%). The median transport interval was 22 (IQR 5] minutes. The limbs most often injured were the left and right upper extremities (15 each). EMS clinicians and police officers were most often the tourniquet placers. Common mechanisms of injury included gunshot wounds, motorcycle accidents, and glass injuries. CONCLUSION: Tourniquets used in the prehospital setting have a high rate of hemorrhage control and a low rate of complications.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Heridas por Arma de Fuego / Servicios Médicos de Urgencia Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Prehosp Emerg Care Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA DE EMERGENCIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Heridas por Arma de Fuego / Servicios Médicos de Urgencia Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Prehosp Emerg Care Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA DE EMERGENCIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Reino Unido