Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
AAPM WGDCAB Report 372: A joint AAPM, ESTRO, ABG, and ABS report on commissioning of model-based dose calculation algorithms in brachytherapy.
Beaulieu, Luc; Ballester, Facundo; Granero, Domingo; Tedgren, Åsa Carlsson; Haworth, Annette; Lowenstein, Jessica R; Ma, Yunzhi; Mourtada, Firas; Papagiannis, Panagiotis; Rivard, Mark J; Siebert, Frank-André; Sloboda, Ron S; Smith, Ryan L; Thomson, Rowan M; Verhaegen, Frank; Fonseca, Gabriel; Vijande, Javier.
Afiliación
  • Beaulieu L; Service de Physique Médicale et Radioprotection et Axe Oncologie du Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec, CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada.
  • Ballester F; Département de Physique, de Génie Physique et d'Optique et Centre de Recherche sur le Cancer, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada.
  • Granero D; Departamento de Física Atómica, Molecular y Nuclear, IRIMED, IIS-La Fe-Universitat de Valencia, Burjassot, Spain.
  • Tedgren ÅC; Departamento de Física Atómica, Molecular y Nuclear, IRIMED, IIS-La Fe-Universitat de Valencia, Burjassot, Spain.
  • Haworth A; Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences (HMV), Radiation Physics, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
  • Lowenstein JR; Medical Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Ma Y; Department of Oncology Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Mourtada F; School of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
  • Papagiannis P; Department of Radiation Physics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Rivard MJ; Service de Physique Médicale et Radioprotection et Axe Oncologie du Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec, CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada.
  • Siebert FA; Département de Physique, de Génie Physique et d'Optique et Centre de Recherche sur le Cancer, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada.
  • Sloboda RS; Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Smith RL; Medical Physics Laboratory, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
  • Thomson RM; Department of Radiation Oncology, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
  • Verhaegen F; Clinic of Radiotherapy, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
  • Fonseca G; Department of Medical Physics, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  • Vijande J; Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Med Phys ; 50(8): e946-e960, 2023 Aug.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37427750
The introduction of model-based dose calculation algorithms (MBDCAs) in brachytherapy provides an opportunity for a more accurate dose calculation and opens the possibility for novel, innovative treatment modalities. The joint AAPM, ESTRO, and ABG Task Group 186 (TG-186) report provided guidance to early adopters. However, the commissioning aspect of these algorithms was described only in general terms with no quantitative goals. This report, from the Working Group on Model-Based Dose Calculation Algorithms in Brachytherapy, introduced a field-tested approach to MBDCA commissioning. It is based on a set of well-characterized test cases for which reference Monte Carlo (MC) and vendor-specific MBDCA dose distributions are available in a Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine-Radiotherapy (DICOM-RT) format to the clinical users. The key elements of the TG-186 commissioning workflow are now described in detail, and quantitative goals are provided. This approach leverages the well-known Brachytherapy Source Registry jointly managed by the AAPM and the Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core (IROC) Houston Quality Assurance Center (with associated links at ESTRO) to provide open access to test cases as well as step-by-step user guides. While the current report is limited to the two most widely commercially available MBDCAs and only for 192 Ir-based afterloading brachytherapy at this time, this report establishes a general framework that can easily be extended to other brachytherapy MBDCAs and brachytherapy sources. The AAPM, ESTRO, ABG, and ABS recommend that clinical medical physicists implement the workflow presented in this report to validate both the basic and the advanced dose calculation features of their commercial MBDCAs. Recommendations are also given to vendors to integrate advanced analysis tools into their brachytherapy treatment planning system to facilitate extensive dose comparisons. The use of the test cases for research and educational purposes is further encouraged.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Braquiterapia Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Health_economic_evaluation Idioma: En Revista: Med Phys Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Braquiterapia Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Health_economic_evaluation Idioma: En Revista: Med Phys Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos