Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Immediate Plastic Surgery Intervention after Soft Tissue Sarcoma Resection: Examining Wound Healing, Readmission, and Reoperation.
Wu, Scott A; deVries, John A; Plantz, Mark A; Dumanian, Gregory; Attar, Samer; Ko, Jason H; Peabody, Terrance D.
Afiliación
  • Wu SA; From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill.
  • deVries JA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, Nev.
  • Plantz MA; From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill.
  • Dumanian G; Department of Plastic Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill.
  • Attar S; Department of Plastic Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill.
  • Ko JH; Department of Plastic Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill.
  • Peabody TD; From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open ; 11(6): e4988, 2023 Jun.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37305195
Many orthopedic and surgical oncologists use a multidisciplinary approach to soft tissue sarcoma (STS) resection. This study assesses the role of immediate plastic surgeon involvement during index soft tissue sarcoma resection. Methods: Adult patients who underwent index STS resection between 2005 and 2018 were queried from an institutional database. Main outcomes analyzed were 90-day same-site reoperation, any-cause readmission, and wound healing complications. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to identify risk factors. Additional evaluation was then performed for the following two cohorts: patients with and without plastic surgeon involvement. Results: In total, 228 cases were analyzed. Multivariate regression demonstrated the following predictors for 90-day wound-healing complications: plastic surgery intervention [OR = 0.321 (0.141-0.728), P = 0.007], operative time [OR = 1.003 (1.000-1.006), P = 0.039], and hospital length of stay [OR = 1.195 (1.004-1.367), P = 0.010]. For 90-day readmission, operative time [OR = 1.004 (1.001-1.007), P = 0.023] and tumor stage [OR = 1.966 (1.140-3.389), P = 0.015] emerged as multivariate predictors. Patients whose resection included a plastic surgeon experienced similar primary outcomes despite these patients having expectedly longer operative times (220 ± 182 versus 108 ± 67 minutes, P < 0.001) and hospital length of stay (3.99 ± 3.69 versus 1.36 ± 1.97 days, P < 0.001). Conclusions: Plastic surgeon involvement emerged as a significant protector against 90-day wound healing complications. Cases that included plastic surgeons achieved similar complication rates in all categories relative to cases without plastic surgery intervention, despite greater operative time, hospital length of stay, and medical complications.

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos