Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Adherence to Post-polypectomy Surveillance Guidelines at a Large District General Hospital.
Butler, Daniel M; Myintmo, Aye; Flashman, Harriet; Ukoumunne, Obioha C; Bethune, Rob.
Afiliación
  • Butler DM; Colorectal Surgery, Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, GBR.
  • Myintmo A; Colorectal Surgery, Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, GBR.
  • Flashman H; Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, GBR.
  • Ukoumunne OC; Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, GBR.
  • Bethune R; Colorectal Surgery, Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, GBR.
Cureus ; 15(2): e35516, 2023 Feb.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37007318
Introduction In 2020, the British Society of Gastroenterologists (BSG), the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI), and Public Health England (PHE) published joint guidelines regarding post-polypectomy surveillance. This study aimed to establish clinician adherence at the Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust to the 2020 guidelines compared to the now-retired 2010 guidelines. Materials and Methods Data on 152 patients treated under the 2010 guidelines and 133 patients treated under the 2020 guidelines were collected retrospectively from the hospital's colonoscopy database. Data were analysed to determine whether patients who had a colonoscopy fulfilled BSG/ACPGBI/PHE guidelines for follow-up. Costs were estimated using the price of colonoscopy in the NHS National Schedule. Results Approximately 41.4% (63/152) of patients were adherent to the 2010 guidelines while 66.2% (88/133) of patients were adherent to the 2020 guidelines. The difference in adherence rate was 24.7% (95% confidence interval 13.5% - 35.9%, p<0.0001). Nearly 37% (35/95) of patients who would have been followed up under the 2010 guidelines did not receive any follow-up as a result of the 2020 guidelines. This represents a cost saving of £36,892.28 per year in our hospital. Approximately 47% (28/60) of patients treated under the 2020 guidelines had surveillance colonoscopy planned when the guidelines recommended no follow-up. If every clinician were fully adherent to the 2020 guidelines, then a further £29,513.82 per year would have been saved. Discussion and Conclusion Following the introduction of the 2020 guidelines, adherence to polyp surveillance guidelines increased in our hospital. However, nearly half of the colonoscopies were performed unnecessarily due to non-adherence. Furthermore, our results demonstrate that the 2020 guidelines have decreased the need for follow-up.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Qualitative_research / Screening_studies Idioma: En Revista: Cureus Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Qualitative_research / Screening_studies Idioma: En Revista: Cureus Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos