Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Differences among a Portuguese cohort of BRCA pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants carriers choosing risk-reducing mastectomy or intensive breast surveillance.
Torres, Sandra; Peleteiro, Bárbara; Magalhães, André; Garrido, Luzia; Costa, Susy; Fougo, José Luís.
Afiliación
  • Torres S; Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal. sandra.torres.med@gmail.com.
  • Peleteiro B; Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal.
  • Magalhães A; Breast Center, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal.
  • Garrido L; EPI Unit, Institute of Public Health, University of Porto, 4050-600, Porto, Portugal.
  • Costa S; Laboratory for Integrative and Translation Research in Population Health, University of Porto, 4050-600, Porto, Portugal.
  • Fougo JL; Breast Center, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol ; 149(10): 7529-7538, 2023 Aug.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36971799
PURPOSE: Women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants have a higher risk to develop breast and ovarian cancer. In structured high-risk clinics, risk-reducing measures are adopted. This study aimed at characterizing these women and identify factors that may have influenced their choice between risk reduction mastectomy (RRM) and intensive breast surveillance (IBS). METHODS: This study reviewed retrospectively 187 clinical records of affected and unaffected women with P/LP variants of the BRCA1/2 genes, from 2007 to 2022, of which 50 chose RRM, while 137 chose IBS. The research focused on personal and family history and tumor characteristics and their relation with the preventive option chosen. RESULTS: Among women with personal history of breast cancer, a higher proportion opted for RRM compared to those asymptomatic (34.2% vs 21.3%, p = 0.049), with younger age determining the option for RRM (38.5 years vs 44.0 years, p < 0.001). Among women with personal history of ovarian cancer, a higher proportion opted for RRM compared to those without that history (62.5% vs 25.1%, p = 0.033), with younger age determining the option for RRM (42.6 years vs 62.7 years, p = 0.009). Women who had bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy were more likely to choose RRM than those who did not (37.3% vs 18.3%, p = 0.003). Family history was not associated with preventive option (33.3% vs 25.3, p = 0.346). CONCLUSIONS: The decision for the preventive option is multifactorial. In our study, personal history of breast or ovarian cancer, younger age at diagnosis, and previous bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy were associated with the choice of RRM. Family history was not associated with the preventive option.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Ováricas / Neoplasias de la Mama Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Portugal Pais de publicación: Alemania

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Ováricas / Neoplasias de la Mama Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Portugal Pais de publicación: Alemania