Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical efficacy and complications of transurethral resection of the prostate versus plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate.
Yang, Chong-Yi; Chen, Ge-Ming; Wu, Yue-Xiang; Zhang, Wei-Jie; Wang, Jie; Chen, Peng-Peng; Lou, Zhen-Yuan.
Afiliación
  • Yang CY; Department of Urology, Ninghai First Hospital, Ningbo, 315600, Zhejiang, China.
  • Chen GM; Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310000, Zhejiang, China.
  • Wu YX; Community Health Service Center of Yuehu, Ningbo, 315000, Zhejiang, China.
  • Zhang WJ; Department of Urology, Ninghai First Hospital, Ningbo, 315600, Zhejiang, China.
  • Wang J; Department of Urology, Ninghai First Hospital, Ningbo, 315600, Zhejiang, China.
  • Chen PP; Department of Urology, Ninghai First Hospital, Ningbo, 315600, Zhejiang, China.
  • Lou ZY; Department of Urology, Ninghai First Hospital, Ningbo, 315600, Zhejiang, China. yiqiaozhant7@163.com.
Eur J Med Res ; 28(1): 83, 2023 Feb 18.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36805825
BACKGROUND: Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common disease in elderly males, and many kinds of minimally invasive procedures can be used for the treatment of BPH. However, various procedures have caused some controversies regarding clinical outcomes, so more studies are needed to validate these controversial topics. AIMS: This study aimed to explore differences of clinical efficacy, surgical features, and complications between transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate (PKEP) for BPH. METHODS: A total of eligible 850 cases of BPH underwent TURP (the TURP group, 320 cases) or PKEP (the PKEP group, 530 cases) in the urology department of our hospital from March 2015 to 2018 were involved in this study. Then, the baseline data, surgical characteristics, IPSS, QoL, PVR, Qmax, IIEF-5, and documented complications were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The operative time, intraoperative irrigation volume, postoperative hemoglobin, decrease in hemoglobin, postoperative irrigation time and volume, catheterization time, and hospital stay of the PKEP group were significantly less than those of the TURP group (all P < 0.05). At 3 months, 1, 2, and 3 years after operation, no significant differences were observed in IPSS, QoL, PVR, but the results of Qmax and IIEF-5 in the PKEP group were significantly higher than those parameters in the TURP group (all P < 0.05). The incidences of massive blood loss, postoperative secondary bleeding, blood transfusion, capsular perforation, urinary tract irritation, bladder spasm, clot retention, urinary tract infection, transient incontinence, erectile dysfunction, and the incidences of II, III grade of Clavien-Dindo classification in the PKEP group were significantly lower than those of the TURP group (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The clinical efficacy of PKEP is compared favorably with TURP during midterm follow-up. Given the merits such as less blood loss and hospital stay, lower complications, PKEP should be given a priority for BPH.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Hiperplasia Prostática / Resección Transuretral de la Próstata Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Aged / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Med Res Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Hiperplasia Prostática / Resección Transuretral de la Próstata Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Aged / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Med Res Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China Pais de publicación: Reino Unido