Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Breast Reconstruction Outcomes with and without Strattice: Long-Term Outcomes of a Multicenter Study Comparing Strattice Immediate Implant Breast Reconstruction with Submuscular Implant Reconstruction.
Wilson, Rebecca L; Kirwan, Cliona C; Johnson, Richard K; O'Donoghue, Joe M; Linforth, Richard A; Harvey, James R.
Afiliación
  • Wilson RL; From the Nightingale Centre.
  • Kirwan CC; From the Nightingale Centre.
  • Johnson RK; Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine, and Health, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester.
  • O'Donoghue JM; From the Nightingale Centre.
  • Linforth RA; Department of Plastic Surgery, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle Upon Tyne NHS Foundation Trust.
  • Harvey JR; Breast Surgery Department, Bradford Teaching Hospital NHS Trust.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 152(1): 11-19, 2023 07 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36728408
BACKGROUND: Over half of immediate implant-based breast reconstructions (IBBR) are performed with an acellular dermal matrix, despite limited long-term outcome data. METHODS: The Breast Reconstruction Outcomes with and without Strattice, or BROWSE, study was a retrospective multicenter cohort study comparing consecutive patients who had undergone immediate Strattice IBBR with those who had undergone immediate IBBR with a submuscular technique between January of 2009 and December of 2015. RESULTS: This study compared 553 Strattice reconstructions with 242 submuscular reconstructions, with a median follow-up of 4.3 years (range, 2 to 9.3 years) and 5.7 years (range, 2 to 8.1 years), respectively, demonstrating an equivalent total complication rate [Strattice, n = 204 (36.9%); submuscular, n = 77 (31.8%); P = 0.17] and implant loss rate (8.5% versus 5.4%, respectively; P = 0.12). Infection rates and wound dehiscence rates were higher in the Strattice cohort [ n = 114 (20.6%) versus n = 31 (12.8%), P = 0.009; and n = 90 (16.3%) versus n = 25 (10.4%), P = 0.03, respectively]. Overall revision rates were comparable [ n = 226 (46.7%) versus n = 79 (41.1%); P = 0.2], but significantly fewer Strattice reconstructions required revision surgery for capsular contracture (5.3% versus 15.6%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Although the risk of complications associated with Strattice reconstruction is numerically higher than that for submuscular coverage, the difference is small and not statistically significant, and likely outweighed by the clear reduced rate of revision surgery because of capsular contracture when Strattice is used. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Mama / Mamoplastia / Implantes de Mama / Contractura / Implantación de Mama / Dermis Acelular Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Plast Reconstr Surg Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Mama / Mamoplastia / Implantes de Mama / Contractura / Implantación de Mama / Dermis Acelular Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Plast Reconstr Surg Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos