Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Does muscle growth mediate changes in a nonspecific strength task?
Spitz, Robert W; Dankel, Scott J; Jessee, Matthew B; Wong, Vickie; Bell, Zachary W; Abe, Takashi; Loenneke, Jeremy P.
Afiliación
  • Spitz RW; Department of Health, Exercise Science, and Recreation Management, Kevser Ermin Applied Physiology Laboratory, The University of Mississippi, University Park, Mississippi, USA.
  • Dankel SJ; Department of Health and Exercise Science, Exercise Physiology Laboratory, Rowan University, Glassboro, New Jersey, USA.
  • Jessee MB; Department of Health, Exercise Science, and Recreation Management, Applied Human Health and Physical Function Laboratory, The University of Mississippi, University Park, Mississippi, USA.
  • Wong V; Department of Health, Exercise Science, and Recreation Management, Kevser Ermin Applied Physiology Laboratory, The University of Mississippi, University Park, Mississippi, USA.
  • Bell ZW; Department of Health, Exercise Science, and Recreation Management, Kevser Ermin Applied Physiology Laboratory, The University of Mississippi, University Park, Mississippi, USA.
  • Abe T; Graduate School of Health and Sports Science & Institute of Health and Sports Science and Medicine, Juntendo University, Inzai, Chiba, Japan.
  • Loenneke JP; Department of Health, Exercise Science, and Recreation Management, Kevser Ermin Applied Physiology Laboratory, The University of Mississippi, University Park, Mississippi, USA.
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging ; 43(4): 223-231, 2023 Jul.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36647320
The purpose of this study was to determine if muscle growth mediates increases in a strength task which was not directly trained. One hundred fifty-one participants were randomized into control, one-repetition maximum training (1RM-TRAIN), or traditional training (TRAD-TRAIN). Training groups performed isotonic elbow flexion 3x/week for 6 weeks. Anterior muscle thickness at 50%, 60% and 70% upper arm length, and maximal isokinetic torque at 60°/sec were assessed pre- and post-training. Change-score mediation models (adjusted for sex, pre-muscle thickness, and pre-strength) were constructed for each muscle thickness site. The effects of each training group were evaluated relative to the control. Data is presented as coefficient (95% CI). There were no significant relative direct effects on nonspecific strength for either training group outside of the 60% model (1.7 [0.13, 3.27] Nm). The relative effect of 1RM-TRAIN on muscle thickness was greater in 60% (0.09 [0.01, 0.17] cm) and 70% (0.09 [0.00, 0.17] cm) models; while TRAD-TRAIN was greater in all three: (50% = 0.24 [0.15, 0.32]; 60% = 0.24 [0.16, 0.33]; 70% = 0.22 [0.14, 0.31] cm). The effect of muscle thickness on nonspecific strength was only significant for the 60% (-3.06 [-5.7, -0.35] Nm) model. The relative indirect effect on nonspecific strength was not significant for the 1RM-TRAIN or TRAD-TRAIN. Similar to previous findings on specific strength, we did not find evidence for a mediating effect of muscle growth on training induced increases in nonspecific strength. The importance of muscle growth for changes in nonspecifically trained strength may need to be reconsidered.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Músculo Esquelético / Entrenamiento de Fuerza Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin Physiol Funct Imaging Asunto de la revista: FISIOLOGIA / PATOLOGIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Músculo Esquelético / Entrenamiento de Fuerza Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin Physiol Funct Imaging Asunto de la revista: FISIOLOGIA / PATOLOGIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Reino Unido