A scoping review on the use of natural language processing in research on political polarization: trends and research prospects.
J Comput Soc Sci
; 6(1): 289-313, 2023.
Article
en En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-36568020
As part of the "text-as-data" movement, Natural Language Processing (NLP) provides a computational way to examine political polarization. We conducted a methodological scoping review of studies published since 2010 (n = 154) to clarify how NLP research has conceptualized and measured political polarization, and to characterize the degree of integration of the two different research paradigms that meet in this research area. We identified biases toward US context (59%), Twitter data (43%) and machine learning approach (33%). Research covers different layers of the political public sphere (politicians, experts, media, or the lay public), however, very few studies involved more than one layer. Results indicate that only a few studies made use of domain knowledge and a high proportion of the studies were not interdisciplinary. Those studies that made efforts to interpret the results demonstrated that the characteristics of political texts depend not only on the political position of their authors, but also on other often-overlooked factors. Ignoring these factors may lead to overly optimistic performance measures. Also, spurious results may be obtained when causal relations are inferred from textual data. Our paper provides arguments for the integration of explanatory and predictive modeling paradigms, and for a more interdisciplinary approach to polarization research. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s42001-022-00196-2.
Texto completo:
1
Colección:
01-internacional
Base de datos:
MEDLINE
Tipo de estudio:
Prognostic_studies
/
Systematic_reviews
Idioma:
En
Revista:
J Comput Soc Sci
Año:
2023
Tipo del documento:
Article
País de afiliación:
Hungria
Pais de publicación:
Singapur