Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of U-Net models in automated cervical spine and cranial bone segmentation using X-ray images for traumatic atlanto-occipital dislocation diagnosis.
Shim, Jae-Hyuk; Kim, Woo Seok; Kim, Kwang Gi; Yee, Gi Taek; Kim, Young Jae; Jeong, Tae Seok.
Afiliación
  • Shim JH; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.
  • Kim WS; Department of Traumatology, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.
  • Kim KG; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea. kimkg@gachon.ac.kr.
  • Yee GT; Department of Neurosurgery, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea. gtyee@gilhospital.com.
  • Kim YJ; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.
  • Jeong TS; Department of Traumatology, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 21438, 2022 12 12.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36509842
Segmentation of the cervical spine in tandem with three cranial bones, hard palate, basion, and opisthion using X-ray images is crucial for measuring metrics used to diagnose traumatic atlanto-occipital dislocation (TAOD). Previous studies utilizing automated segmentation methods have been limited to segmenting parts of the cervical spine (C3 ~ C7), due to difficulties in defining the boundaries of C1 and C2 bones. Additionally, there has yet to be a study that includes cranial bone segmentations necessary for determining TAOD diagnosing metrics, which are usually defined by measuring the distance between certain cervical (C1 ~ C7) and cranial (hard palate, basion, opisthion) bones. For this study, we trained a U-Net model on 513 sagittal X-ray images with segmentations of both cervical and cranial bones for an automated solution to segmenting important features for diagnosing TAOD. Additionally, we tested U-Net derivatives, recurrent residual U-Net, attention U-Net, and attention recurrent residual U-Net to observe any notable differences in segmentation behavior. The accuracy of U-Net models ranged from 99.07 to 99.12%, and dice coefficient values ranged from 88.55 to 89.41%. Results showed that all 4 tested U-Net models were capable of segmenting bones used in measuring TAOD metrics with high accuracy.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Luxaciones Articulares Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Sci Rep Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Luxaciones Articulares Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Sci Rep Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Reino Unido