Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessing the reliability and cross-sectional and longitudinal validity of fifteen bioelectrical impedance analysis devices.
Siedler, Madelin R; Rodriguez, Christian; Stratton, Matthew T; Harty, Patrick S; Keith, Dale S; Green, Jacob J; Boykin, Jake R; White, Sarah J; Williams, Abegale D; DeHaven, Brielle; Tinsley, Grant M.
Afiliación
  • Siedler MR; Department of Kinesiology and Sport Management, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA.
  • Rodriguez C; Department of Kinesiology and Sport Management, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA.
  • Stratton MT; Department of Kinesiology and Sport Management, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA.
  • Harty PS; Department of Kinesiology and Sport Management, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA.
  • Keith DS; Department of Kinesiology and Sport Management, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA.
  • Green JJ; Department of Kinesiology and Sport Management, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA.
  • Boykin JR; Department of Kinesiology and Sport Management, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA.
  • White SJ; Department of Kinesiology and Sport Management, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA.
  • Williams AD; Department of Kinesiology and Sport Management, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA.
  • DeHaven B; Department of Kinesiology and Sport Management, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA.
  • Tinsley GM; Department of Kinesiology and Sport Management, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA.
Br J Nutr ; 130(5): 827-840, 2023 09 14.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36404739
The purpose of this investigation was to expand upon the limited existing research examining the test-retest reliability, cross-sectional validity and longitudinal validity of a sample of bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) devices as compared with a laboratory four-compartment (4C) model. Seventy-three healthy participants aged 19-50 years were assessed by each of fifteen BIA devices, with resulting body fat percentage estimates compared with a 4C model utilising air displacement plethysmography, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and bioimpedance spectroscopy. A subset of thirty-seven participants returned for a second visit 12-16 weeks later and were included in an analysis of longitudinal validity. The sample of devices included fourteen consumer-grade and one research-grade model in a variety of configurations: hand-to-hand, foot-to-foot and bilateral hand-to-foot (octapolar). BIA devices demonstrated high reliability, with precision error ranging from 0·0 to 0·49 %. Cross-sectional validity varied, with constant error relative to the 4C model ranging from -3·5 (sd 4·1) % to 11·7 (sd 4·7) %, standard error of the estimate values of 3·1-7·5 % and Lin's concordance correlation coefficients (CCC) of 0·48-0·94. For longitudinal validity, constant error ranged from -0·4 (sd 2·1) % to 1·3 (sd 2·7) %, with standard error of the estimate values of 1·7-2·6 % and Lin's CCC of 0·37-0·78. While performance varied widely across the sample investigated, select models of BIA devices (particularly octapolar and select foot-to-foot devices) may hold potential utility for the tracking of body composition over time, particularly in contexts in which the purchase or use of a research-grade device is infeasible.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Composición Corporal Tipo de estudio: Prevalence_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Br J Nutr Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Composición Corporal Tipo de estudio: Prevalence_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Br J Nutr Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Reino Unido