Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A comparison of uni- and multi-variate methods for identifying brain networks activated by cognitive tasks using intracranial EEG.
Donos, Cristian; Blidarescu, Bogdan; Pistol, Constantin; Oane, Irina; Mindruta, Ioana; Barborica, Andrei.
Afiliación
  • Donos C; Department of Physics, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania.
  • Blidarescu B; Department of Physics, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania.
  • Pistol C; Department of Physics, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania.
  • Oane I; Department of Physics, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania.
  • Mindruta I; Epilepsy Monitoring Unit, Department of Neurology, Emergency University Hospital Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania.
  • Barborica A; Department of Physics, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania.
Front Neurosci ; 16: 946240, 2022.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36225734
Cognitive tasks are commonly used to identify brain networks involved in the underlying cognitive process. However, inferring the brain networks from intracranial EEG data presents several challenges related to the sparse spatial sampling of the brain and the high variability of the EEG trace due to concurrent brain processes. In this manuscript, we use a well-known facial emotion recognition task to compare three different ways of analyzing the contrasts between task conditions: permutation cluster tests, machine learning (ML) classifiers, and a searchlight implementation of multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) for intracranial sparse data recorded from 13 patients undergoing presurgical evaluation for drug-resistant epilepsy. Using all three methods, we aim at highlighting the brain structures with significant contrast between conditions. In the absence of ground truth, we use the scientific literature to validate our results. The comparison of the three methods' results shows moderate agreement, measured by the Jaccard coefficient, between the permutation cluster tests and the machine learning [0.33 and 0.52 for the left (LH) and right (RH) hemispheres], and 0.44 and 0.37 for the LH and RH between the permutation cluster tests and MVPA. The agreement between ML and MVPA is higher: 0.65 for the LH and 0.62 for the RH. To put these results in context, we performed a brief review of the literature and we discuss how each brain structure's involvement in the facial emotion recognition task.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Front Neurosci Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Rumanía Pais de publicación: Suiza

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Front Neurosci Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Rumanía Pais de publicación: Suiza