Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Pre-incisional Laparoscopic Preperitoneal Local Anesthetic Technique in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.
Aldohayan, Abdullah; Alshammari, Sulaiman; Binjaloud, Ahmed; Bamehriz, Fahad; Narejo, Abdul Sattar; Aqil, Mansoor; Aldahian, Nahlah; Aldabaeab, Abdulaziz; Eldawlatly, Abdelazeem.
Afiliación
  • Aldohayan A; Department of Surgery, University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
  • Alshammari S; Department of Surgery, University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
  • Binjaloud A; Department of Surgery, University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
  • Bamehriz F; Department of Surgery, University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
  • Narejo AS; Anesthesia Department, University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
  • Aqil M; Anesthesia Department, University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
  • Aldahian N; Anesthesia Department, University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
  • Aldabaeab A; Pharmacology Department, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
  • Eldawlatly A; Department of Surgery, University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
JSLS ; 26(3)2022.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36071990
Background: The increasing prevalence of obesity is a significant concern worldwide. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is an effective and standard procedure for sustained weight loss. However, optimal pain control is essential for enhanced recovery after surgery. The aim of this randomized controlled study was to investigate the efficacy of a pre-incisional laparoscopic preperitoneal local anesthetic technique (PLPLAT) on recovery characteristics following LSG. Methods: A total of 120 obese patients scheduled to undergo LSG were randomized into the PLPLAT or placebo group (n = 60 patients in both groups). All patients received conventional intravenous or other analgesics postoperatively, as required. The primary outcome was the postoperative pain score. The secondary outcomes included morphine consumption, other analgesics, length of stay in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), hemodynamic changes, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), early mobilization, and length of hospital stay. Results: Pain scores in the PACU and at 12 hours after surgery in the ward were significantly lower in the PLPLAT group than in the placebo group (P < 0.05). The morphine consumption was significantly less in PLPLAT group with mean dosage of 2.95 mg (± 0.39) compared to 6.0 mg (± 0.4) in placebo group. PONV, mean arterial pressure, and PACU stay were significantly higher in the placebo group than in the PLPLAT group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Intraoperative PLPLAT provide effective postoperative pain relief for patients undergoing LSG. The findings indicated the efficacy of PLPLAT in reducing postoperative pain, enhancing recovery, and facilitating early discharge.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Laparoscopía / Anestésicos Locales Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: JSLS Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Arabia Saudita Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Laparoscopía / Anestésicos Locales Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: JSLS Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Arabia Saudita Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos