Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Determinants of farmers' biosecurity mindset: A social-ecological model using systems thinking.
Pao, Hai-Ni; Jackson, Elizabeth; Yang, Tsang-Sung; Tsai, Jyan-Syung; Sung, Watson H T; Pfeiffer, Dirk U.
Afiliación
  • Pao HN; Department of Pathobiology and Population Sciences, Veterinary Epidemiology, Economics, and Public Health Group, Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, United Kingdom.
  • Jackson E; School of Management and Marketing, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia.
  • Yang TS; Independent Researcher, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Tsai JS; Department of Finance and Cooperative Management, National Taipei University, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Sung WHT; Agricultural Bank of Taiwan, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Pfeiffer DU; Department of Pathobiology and Population Sciences, Veterinary Epidemiology, Economics, and Public Health Group, Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, United Kingdom.
Front Vet Sci ; 9: 959934, 2022.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36046509
Commercial poultry is often farmed in high-density facilities, therefore, predisposing exposure to threats of infectious diseases. Studies suggest that it is likely that farmers have little motivation to practise on-farm biosecurity. In Taiwan, where high-density intensive poultry production is commonplace, unfortunately, several avian influenza outbreaks have occurred over the past decade despite the establishment of biosecurity procedures. To develop effective interventions, it is essential to understand the determinants of farmers' biosecurity mindset through systems thinking. In this qualitative study, we directly explored the opinions of Taiwan's chicken farmers, and a grounded theory analysis was performed. The study revealed that farmers allocate resources based on their justification for the optimisation of resource utilisation, and biosecurity is the most concerning challenge. Farmers focus on the economic aspects of their production systems, particularly when the implementation of biosecurity increases production costs, and there are multifaceted, complex barriers to implementing on-farm biosecurity. Although the participant farmers accepted to take major responsibility for disease management, paradoxically, some farmers blamed the practicality of government regulations and government employees' attitudes. Additionally, the farmers rejected the government's intentions to ask farmers to take major responsibility for the outbreaks of avian influenza while some of them intended to ignore the perceived risks. Government interventions that were considered not directly related to biosecurity also negatively influenced farmers' willingness to improve biosecurity. Using the interview results together with information in the scientific literature, we constructed a modified six-level social-ecological model to explain the complex influences of macro socio-economic conditions on farmers' biosecurity mindset. The novelty of this research lies in its wider relevance to Taiwan's chicken production industry in that it provides first-hand evidence-based knowledge to demonstrate a wide number of determinants of farmers' biosecurity mindset. This social-ecological model highlights the importance of systems thinking for the development of behavioural interventions and allows adaptation to the local context. The findings of this study have relevance to Taiwan's chicken production industry and potentially to similar systems in other countries in the wider region and should result in more effective animal health management at the farm level.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Aspecto: Determinantes_sociais_saude Idioma: En Revista: Front Vet Sci Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido Pais de publicación: Suiza

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Aspecto: Determinantes_sociais_saude Idioma: En Revista: Front Vet Sci Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido Pais de publicación: Suiza