Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Variability in Primary Care Physician Attitudes Toward Medicaid Work Requirement Exemption Requests Made by Patients With Depression.
Schmidt, Harald; Spieker, Andrew J; Luo, Tianying; Szymczak, Julia E; Grande, David.
Afiliación
  • Schmidt H; Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
  • Spieker AJ; Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
  • Luo T; Department of Computer and Information Sciences, Fordham University, Bronx, New York.
  • Szymczak JE; Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
  • Grande D; Perelman School of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
JAMA Health Forum ; 2(10): e212932, 2021 10.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35977164
Importance: Medicaid work requirements seek to promote health and personal responsibility but can also jeopardize health care access. Physicians have a central function in assisting patients with exemption requests, but it is unclear how their role affects patient welfare, professionalism, and the ethical and legal justification of programs. Objective: To understand the degree of variability in physician response to assist patients with depression in receiving a Medicaid work requirement exemption. Design Setting and Participants: We conducted a mailed survey experiment among practicing primary care physicians in the first 4 approved states (Arkansas, Kentucky, Indiana, New Hampshire) in July and October of 2019. We report response, cooperation, refusal, and contact rates in line with American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR) standards. Exposures: In each state, we used an experimental factorial design to randomize recipients to 1 of 4 patient clinical scenarios. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the indicator of willingness to assist a patient reporting depression with an exemption. Results: We received 715 responses (overall AAPOR response rate: 21%; cooperation rate: 84%; refusal rate: 4%; contact rate: 25%). Respondents' mean (SD) age was 54 (12) years; mean (SD) time since graduation, 26 (12) years; 435 (61%) identified as male; 177 as Democrat (25%); 156 as Republican (22%); 197 as Independent/other (28%); and 185 as declined/unknown (26%); the mean (SD) share of Medicaid patients was 29% (21%). We found that 97 of 387 physicians (25%) would offer assistance even when state policy would not support an exemption, and 170 of 315 (54%) would not offer assistance when regulations would require this. Moreover, 49 of 245 respondents (20%) who deemed an exemption appropriate indicated that they would not assist. State, administrative effort, political affiliation, and perceived appropriateness were statistically associated with the odds of assisting with an exemption. Conclusions and Relevance: In this survey study of primary care physicians, we found substantial variation regarding willingness to assist patients qualifying for a work requirement exemption where none should exist. Insofar as work requirements are implemented again, it is critical to proactively identify measures to ensure that patients qualifying for exemptions are not put at risk due to either the burdensomeness of exemption procedures, or physicians' political or personal views.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Medicaid / Médicos de Atención Primaria Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Aspecto: Ethics Límite: Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: JAMA Health Forum Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Medicaid / Médicos de Atención Primaria Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Aspecto: Ethics Límite: Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: JAMA Health Forum Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos