Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy and utilization of intravascular ultrasound in office-based lower extremity endovascular interventions for peripheral arterial disease.
Pesonen, Luke O; Knol, Meghan C; Shelgikar, Chinmaya S; Battaglia, Michael A; Heidenreich, Michael J; Aziz, Abdulhameed.
Afiliación
  • Pesonen LO; Department of Surgery, Section of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 1261St Joseph Mercy Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Knol MC; Department of Surgery, Section of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 1261St Joseph Mercy Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Shelgikar CS; Department of Surgery, Section of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 1261St Joseph Mercy Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Battaglia MA; 584357Methods Consultants, Ypsilanti, MI, USA.
  • Heidenreich MJ; Department of Surgery, Section of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 1261St Joseph Mercy Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Aziz A; Department of Surgery, Section of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 1261St Joseph Mercy Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Vascular ; : 17085381221104630, 2022 Aug 04.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35924685
OBJECTIVES: Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is a uniquely objective but underutilized imaging modality in the interventional treatment of peripheral arterial disease treatment. IVUS has been shown to improve device size selection and diagnose occult pathology difficult to see with routine angiography. We hypothesize that the use of IVUS in lower extremity endovascular intervention improves accuracy in stent and balloon size selection and minimizes contrast use. METHODS: This is a retrospective case series performed at a single-institution outpatient center by two vascular surgeons from July 2016 through July 2017. We identified 94 total IVUS-assisted procedures. We collected data regarding demographics, balloon and stent size, IVUS-determined vessel diameter, pre-procedure and post-procedure ABI values, and contrast used during the procedure. An independent core laboratory was further utilized to characterize all IVUS and angiographic size vessel measurements. RESULTS: For the 94 lower extremity IVUS-assisted interventions, the average patient age was 70±9 years old, with an average contrast use of 37.1 mL of Omnipaque 300. There was substantial improvement in pre- and post-procedure ABI (0.7±0.23 to 0.94±0.21). On analysis of average intraluminal IVUS vessel diameter to balloon angioplasty used, we had a correlation in size of 0.96±0.16 in our series. Additionally, in eight instances IVUS allowed for identification of a flow-limiting dissection with subsequent stenting. CONCLUSIONS: Routine use of IVUS offers a powerful diagnostic paradigm that has the potential to significantly decrease contrast use and to improve objectivity in choosing appropriate vascular tools to maximize intra-procedural efficacy. The discovery of adverse findings not initially noticed on angiography further reinforces the value of IVUS utilization.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Vascular Asunto de la revista: ANGIOLOGIA / CARDIOLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Vascular Asunto de la revista: ANGIOLOGIA / CARDIOLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Reino Unido