Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Delphi study to identify consensus on patient selection for hydrogel rectal spacer use during radiation therapy for prostate cancer in the UK.
Payne, Heather Ann; Jain, Suneil; Peedell, Clive; Edwards, Albert; Thomas, James Andrew; Das, Prantik; Hansson Hedblom, Amanda; Woodward, Emily; Saunders, Rhodri; Bahl, Amit.
Afiliación
  • Payne HA; Department of Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Jain S; School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
  • Peedell C; Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK.
  • Edwards A; Kent Oncology Centre, Kent, UK.
  • Thomas JA; Department of Urology, Princess of Wales Hospital, Bridgend, UK.
  • Das P; Department of Oncology, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, UK.
  • Hansson Hedblom A; Coreva Scientific GmbH und Co KG, Königswinter, Germany.
  • Woodward E; Health Economics, Boston Scientific AG, Solothurn, Switzerland.
  • Saunders R; Coreva Scientific GmbH und Co KG, Königswinter, Germany rhodri@coreva-scientific.com.
  • Bahl A; Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.
BMJ Open ; 12(7): e060506, 2022 07 20.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35858729
OBJECTIVES: To identify consensus on patient prioritisation for rectal hydrogel spacer use during radiation therapy for the treatment of prostate cancer in the UK. DESIGN: Delphi study consisting of two rounds of online questionnaires, two virtual advisory board meetings and a final online questionnaire. SETTING: Radical radiation therapy for localised and locally advanced prostate cancer in the UK. PARTICIPANTS: Six leading clinical oncologists and one urologist from across the UK. INTERVENTIONS: Rectal hydrogel spacer. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: None reported. RESULTS: The panel reached consensus on the importance of minimising toxicity for treatments with curative intent and that even low-grade toxicity-related adverse events can significantly impact quality of life. There was agreement that despite meeting rectal dose constraints, too many patients experience rectal toxicity and that rectal hydrogel spacers in eligible patients significantly reduces toxicity-related adverse events. However, as a consequence of funding limitations, patients need to be prioritised for spacer use. A higher benefit of spacers can be expected in patients on anticoagulation and in patients with diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease, but consensus could not be reached regarding patient groups expected to benefit less. While radiation therapy regimen is not a main factor determining prioritisation, higher benefit is expected in ultrahypofractionated regimens. CONCLUSION: There is a strong and general agreement that all patients with prostate cancer undergoing radical radiation therapy have the potential to benefit from hydrogel spacers. Currently, not all patients who could potentially benefit can access hydrogel spacers, and access is unequal. Implementation of the consensus recommendations would likely help prioritise and equalise access to rectal spacers for patients in the UK.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Próstata / Órganos en Riesgo Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Humans / Male País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Próstata / Órganos en Riesgo Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Humans / Male País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Reino Unido