Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Developing a Mobile Health Application to Communicate Adverse Drug Reactions - Preconditions, Assessment of Possible Functionalities and Barriers for Patients and Their General Practitioners.
Wakob, Ines; Schmid, Gordian Lukas; Nöhring, Ingo; Elze, Romy; Sultzer, Ralf; Frese, Thomas; Schiek, Susanne; Bertsche, Thilo.
Afiliación
  • Wakob I; Clinical Pharmacy, Institute of Pharmacy, Medical Faculty, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
  • Schmid GL; Drug Safety Center, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital of Leipzig and Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
  • Nöhring I; Department of General Practice, Medical Faculty of the University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
  • Elze R; Department of General Practice, Medical Faculty of the University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
  • Sultzer R; University Computer Center, Department of Research and Development, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
  • Frese T; Sana Geriatric Centre, Zwenkau, Germany.
  • Schiek S; Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Martin-Luther-University, Halle (Saale), Germany.
  • Bertsche T; Clinical Pharmacy, Institute of Pharmacy, Medical Faculty, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
J Multidiscip Healthc ; 15: 1445-1455, 2022.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35837350
Purpose: Mobile health (mHealth) applications offer structured and timely communication between patients and general practitioners (GPs) about adverse drug reactions (ADR). Preconditions, functionalities and barriers should be studied to ensure safe implementation. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional questionnaire survey addressing (i) preconditions, (ii) users' assessment of functionalities and (iii) barriers to mHealth managing ADR communication. Results: A total of 480 patients and 31 GPs completed the survey. (i) A total of 269 (56%) patients and 13 (42%) GPs were willing to use mHealth for ADR communication. Willingness was negatively correlated with age for both patients (r = -0.231; p < 0.001) and GPs (r = -0.558; p = 0.002). (ii) Most useful functionalities mentioned by patients (>60%) included "Rapid feedback on urgency of face-to-face consultations." GPs valued information on "Patient's difficulties in medication administration." (iii) In free-text answers, the barrier reported most frequently by patients was "preferred personal GP contact" (6%), whereas GPs claimed, "uncomplicated use with low expenditure of time and personnel" (19%). Conclusion: Older patients and GPs mainly show reservations about mHealth for ADR communication but recognize possible benefits. mHealth implementation should avoid a negative effect on GPs' time budgets; the primary goal should not be to reduce the number of GP-patient contacts but to optimize them.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Qualitative_research Idioma: En Revista: J Multidiscip Healthc Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania Pais de publicación: Nueva Zelanda

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Qualitative_research Idioma: En Revista: J Multidiscip Healthc Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania Pais de publicación: Nueva Zelanda